Would you still worship Jesus if he shows up as a brown man and claims he is a prophet but not God
>>18003713If he says he's not God why worship him?
>>18003713All of humanity is the son dipshit-catholic theologians after thinking about it for five seconds
Billions of Christians would reject him, because the divine claim is central to worship.
>>18003713Nice try, Mossad, but ancient sources all describe Jesus as tall, fair-featured, and blonde-haired.
>>18003713part 4bullet 3get a new script>>18004056/thread
>>18004056>>18004264>hate shitskins or you're a jew/pol/trannies will never be Christians
>>18004349
>>18003713lead off with Jesus is Lord or sum next tjme
>>18004362Christian Identity shill bot
>>18004385stop repeating the same bullshit and maybe you won't get btfo so often
>i spammed the board with the same jpg all week so I wonRetarded bot
Do I have to actually worship jesus to start receiving some of these religious sexts I have been hearing about?
>>18004436Bible will tell you to not forsake the gathering of saints anyways. Psalms has 150 chapters; ofc people will take it seriously.
>>18004349>/pol/tranniesI was mad sleeping on this one kek
>>18003713>claims he is a prophet but not GodNo that would be the Antichrist
>>18004391FIFY.>“And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.” - Revelation 4:3>Jasper is an opaque variety of chalcedony, and the common colors include red, yellow, brown, green or (rarely) blue>Carnelian (Sardine) is a brownish-red mineral commonly used as a semi-precious gemstone
>>18004056What sources?I'm pretty sure this is bullshit. The New Testament doesn't even bother to describe what he looked like, so he could have been black for all we know. Justin Martyr and Tertullian (both believing Christian writers) describe Jesus as unimpressive, or even "ignoble". Do you imagine a tall blonde man in the Middle East would be "unimpressive"? I think a Nordic superman would stick out like a sore thumb and this would be represented in the text of the New Testament.You're essentially basing your Jesus off Renaissance paintings aping Greek gods lmao if that isn't troubling to you, you aren't a Christian.
>>18004705Revelation is easily the worst book of the bible in terms of schizos trying to interpret it. The Reformation and printing press put this into overdrive.>THERE IS A WAR! THIS IS THE END TIMES!!!ok 16th Century man
>>18004768Doesn't Revelations describe Jesus?
>>18004803In highly symbolic language perhaps that COULD be about Jesus but could be about a number of other things..... basically sounds like the writings of a Christian who accidentally overdosed on psychadelics and had a crazy ass trip.
No.
>>18003713Why would Jesus look like an Arab when he is a pure Israelite and predates the existence of this half nigger mutt race by centuries.
>>18004862You will never be a real Christian.
>>18004773>Revelation is easily the worst book of the bible in terms of schizos trying to interpret itBecause schizos do not know who was the real author of Revelation.>The historian Eusebius of Caesarea was commissioned by the Roman Emperor Constantine and took responsibility for creating the official orthodox canon and by 331 AD the first 50 biblical books were canonized and delivered to the Churches of Constantinople. The original canon did not contain the Apocalypse of John (Revelation). Eusebius recorded the words of Dionysius, bishop of Alexandria, in the mid-200s, claiming that Revelation was a forgery. There were other scholars and writers from the first three centuries who were also recorded by Eusebius as testimony regarding the falsity and authenticity of the Book of Revelation and the involvement of a Gnostic Ebionite Rabbi named Cerinthus. A Christian sect called the Alogi claimed that it was clear that Cerinthus was the true author of the Book of Revelation after analyzing and comparing his writing style with that of Johnboo>According to the Catholic Encyclopedia Caius: "Additional light was shown on the subject VI, p. 397 "Caius maintained that the Apocalypse of John was the work of the Gnostic Cerinthus" Cerinthus, a man educated in the wisdom of the Egyptians, operated a school that followed and used the Gospel of Cerinthus. He denied that the Supreme God had made the physical world and denied the divinity of Jesus. Cerinthus was a follower of the Zealot party, a group that had a strong political agenda. The Zealots taught that a political Messiah -military soon appears to conquer the world and rule for a thousand years from Jerusalem
>>18004870>Although Eusebius was certainly right that Polycarp's John was not the disciple John, the Gospel and Apocalypse of John appear to have had a long history together. They both appear to have originated with the Cerinthians and then got adopted by the Valentinians and only then got procured by the Presbyters of the Apostolic Church. Irenaeus said that the Gospel of John was written to refute the Cerinthians but he also said that it was used by the Valentinians. The earliest surviving commentary to the Gospel of John comes from Heracleon, a disciple of Valentinus. Rudolf Bultmann and Randel McCraw Helms both saw the Gospel of John having three different layers: 1) a Jewish Signs Gospel that listed seven miraculous signs performed by Jesus; 2) a spiritualized Gnostic version of John that was anti-Baptism and anti-Eucharist and emphasized that the Logos took on a spiritual body; and 3) an apocalyptic version of John that was pro-Baptism and pro-Eucharist and emphasized that the Logos took on a physical body that was physically crucified and resurrected>Although Bultmann and Helms assumed this evolution happened in the first century, the model makes more sense in a second century context: the Cerinthian Signs gospel was edited into a Valentinian version of John, then Florinus brought that version of the gospel to Rome where Irenaeus or a predecessor rewrote it into the version we know today. Irenaeus then assimilated Florinus' Valentinian figureheads, John and Polycarp, in order to open up the Apostolic Church up to the Valentinians, just as Mark had been assimilated for the Adoptionists, James for the Ebionites, and Paul for the Marcionites
>>18004862WE
>>18004883WUZ
>>18004886ANCIENT JUDEANS
>>18004888N' SHIET
>>18004883>>18004886>>18004888>>18004891Take your meds sandy
>>18004883>>18004886>>18004888>>18004891Btw Every lie has a grain of truth to base it on and it is this:>Haplogroup IJ (M429/P125) is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup, an immediate descendant of Haplogroup IJK (formerly known as Haplogroup F-L15). IJK is a branch of Haplogroup HIJK.>The immediate descendants of IJ are Haplogroup I and Haplogroup J>Haplogroup I (M170) is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It is a subgroup of haplogroup IJ, which itself is a derivative of the haplogroup IJK. Subclades I1 and I2 can be found in most present-day European populations, with peaks in some Northern European and Southeastern European countries>Haplogroup J-M304, also known as J, is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It is believed to have evolved in the Caucasus or Iran. The clade spread from there during the Neolithic, primarily into North Africa, the Horn of Africa, the Socotra Archipelago, Europe, Anatolia, Central Asia, South Asia, and Southeast Asia This is why EHG mixed with CHG to create the Yamnaya.
