Hello,I remember reading about the economy of late Tsarist Russia a long time ago and the paper said it would've grown to be alot more powerful, intact, than if the Bolshevik Revolution happened.I was just wondering if /his/ had ever read that paper, or something like it and also, if you think that's true.
>>18005088It makes sense to me. If Russia never has the Revolution, then there’s suddenly many more people alive, having children, and being productive rather than dead. I think Russia’s only problem would be transitioning into a modern, industrial state and keeping things peaceful. There’s a reason a revolution happened and Tsarist Russia unusually gets called backwards. I’m just a retard though, so I’m curious what other anons think.
>>18005088>Was Russia's revolution.. necessary?No, even some prominent soviet leaders like Khrushchev admitted that the average person enjoyed better quality of life under Tsar than during soviet times. Plus more russians died during Civil War than WWI.
>>18005088Lenin liberated the Slavic proletariat from the Holstein-Gottorp ghouls controlled by Anglo-German finance
>>18005088>Bolshevik Revolutionwrong revolution: feb revolution forced the tzar to abdicate and created a modern (in contemporary terms) democracyoct revolution was a counter-revolution that brought all the savagery of the colonial-imperial system except now with jews instead of germans on top of the food chain>>18005274>Lenin liberatedeastern races from any hope of living with any dignity (yet again)
>>18005371>created a modern (in contemporary terms) democracy>modernsorry typemeant to write masonic
>>18005371>feb revolution forced the tzar to abdicate and created a modern (in contemporary terms) democracyFunniest thing is that the leaders of the revolution told for decades that they are more competent than the Tsar but then they destroyed the entire army and lost their country within half a year.
>>18005088bvmp
>>18005088The tsar was retard and he would have kept the empire if he allowed the duma to evolve into a proper parliament under a kadet-conservative coalition
>>18005088No but it was inevitable after Tannenberg. Russia was not capable of maintaining its level of urbanization while blockaded and the people who lived in those cities were not just going to starve like both the Empire and the Duma expected them to
>>18005268>soviet leaders like Khrushchev admitted that the average person enjoyed better quality of life under Tsar than during soviet timessource? find it hard to believe
>>18006324like Victoria in the UK?
>>18006470More like William of Orange. By the time of Victoria it was pretty clear to everyone that the parliament was never going to get completely ignored by the monarch like in russia.
