>>18005755
Why the fuck is this even discussed? Children are not physically or mentally ready for "marriage."
>In the old days
Besides a few retarded cases, girls usually got married between 15 and 16 and men in their early 20s. We're not talking about children here. My grandfather married my grandmother when she was 15 and he was 20. What Muhammad did was so bizarre that the argument
>But that time
is dead because people even questioned it. Damn, I hate pedos.

>>18005782
Why are you being a racist Islamophobic bigot?

>>18005784
Why are mudslimes being degenerate child fuckers?

framing this as a religious debate is dumb; a lot of men, worldwide, seem attracted to girls under 16. let's start there instead of shielding the sexual motivation behind an outdated practice

They both lost. What a stupid discussion, it's extremely immoral to marry a child today, no matter what our ancestors did in the past.

>>18005782
>Why the fuck is this even discussed? Children are not physically or mentally ready for "marriage."
In what way are they not ready to be a man's wife? A wife's job is to submit to her husband, how is that so hard that a young girl is not capable of doing?

If a girl can obey a father then she can obey a husband. That is literally her job, to obey her husband and that's it.

>>18006269
Why

>>18005782
>Children are not physically or mentally ready for "marriage."
>believes children are physically and mentally ready for "transition"