[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: jjjjjjjjjj.jpg (151 KB, 707x1000)
151 KB
151 KB JPG
So how rich were they at their peak? Did the lost treasure really exist
>>
>>18006288
knights templar didn't exist. neither did any treasure.
>>
>>18006288
They were rich enough that entire kingdoms could go into debt to them. Makes sense, they had centuries of wealth stored up from pilgrims
>>
>>18006288
>>18007064
Templars were chuds that decided to pursue truth on their own in order to circumvent the bureaucracy and corruption of Rome.
They were simply the result of swarthy meds being inspired by the defiant will of the norman-viking knights and crusaders and were interested in how their arianist christian lore clearly predated the Nicene Creed and had something to do with Egypt & Numidia.
>>
>>18007064
just say bump, shitposter. lol



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.