[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 830Z.png (120 KB, 740x1707)
120 KB
120 KB PNG
Do Pajeets look more like Nords or Meds? (ignoring pigmentation). They're about as equally related to both,
>>
>>18007274
Logically it has to be Nords as Pajeets have that Aryan Nordic dna from steppe.
>>
>>18007274
Btw do that chart with Srubnaya samples
>>
>>18007321
No
>>
File: 1710004014167844.jpg (214 KB, 933x826)
214 KB
214 KB JPG
>>18007274
Nords
>>
its literally sintashta (nordic profile) + dravidian mix
>>
>>18007343
Northern Indians are Caucasians. Tamils are Australoid.
>>
>>18007274
Neither. They look like niggers.
>>
File: iu[2].jpg (142 KB, 1500x1221)
142 KB
142 KB JPG
>>18007343
are 'jeets faceblind
>>
>>18007274
Their dravidian dna makes them look closer to Africans due to large noses and wide faces. Basically half abo and half Persian



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.