[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: G1LQ0o5XAAAtW5j.jpg (205 KB, 1367x864)
205 KB
205 KB JPG
Manchubros...
>>
>>18007284
How much do modern manchu differ from the Jurchen of 400 years ago?
And aren't they so similar because a lot of han just adopted a 'manchu' persona when they joined the banners?
>>
>>18007289
Manchu identity is inherently a synthesis of Jurchen, Han, and Mongol, with Jurchen as the base. The name change wasn't just random.
>>
>>18007301
I realise that, but there still is a manchu language, which is just Jurchen, written in a scirpt that is Jurchen (adapted from mongolian)
Manch is almost more a class than an ethnicity, which is why genetics for 'manchu' seem so weird
>>
>>18007289
>How much do modern manchu differ from the Jurchen of 400 years ago?
We only have Ming era Wild Jurchens(WuDiHa) who are Xibo/Daur like, modern Manchus are indistinguishable from Northern Han given the genetic background of Eastern Mongols and Northern Han.

>>18007309
>which is why genetics for 'manchu' seem so weird
I think the irony is that Manchus are far more Han like than the "Han" that particpated in the Taiping rebellion.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.