Cook fired a warning shot, then shot one of the Hawaiians dead. Cook and four marines were killed. After reading history, how do anglos think they are still popular and liked? Do their schools teach them only the good stuff?
>>18012042At least look at Hawaii's flag before shitposting, Rajesh
>>18012042What are you trying to prove here? All I read from this was Cook had balls of fucking steel. He warned them, no? Gentleman to the end.
>>18012042I know this OP is a troll post and/or sperg (as is anyone who uses Anglo unironically) but to answer this seriously;>Do their schools teach them only the good stuff?Schools basically don’t really teach much imperial history at all good or bad. I wouldn’t even say it’s so much censorship or white washing since in my experience of state schools they still fit in plenty of general whitey bad stuff into the curriculum - especially slavery and at least in my school US civil rights stuff was thrown in there. History just covers some basic overview of Romans, Anglo-Saxons, vikings etc in primary school followed by Tudors, civil war and then a time skip to Victorians (only really focusing on industry is le bad) followed by WW1 and WW2 with the latter mostly being the holocaust. I honestly think they just can’t be bothered to fit in how and why the empire developed, how it was run, how it ended, its positive and negative influences on events etc. For the most part history is just badly organised and most students find it very disengaging, hence why English people have a reputation amongst grievance-obsessed Celtic nationalists for not caring about it since it’s mostly just a boring subject in school to our normies.
