Before modern immigration. People were more likely to be related to their neighbors and gradually less related to people as the geographic distance grew. This genetic distance just happens to correspond with ethnicity and race. Why exactly is admitting this controversial (and sometimes even considered evil)? Is understanding kinship and putting your 10th cousins above your 80th cousins really a social construct?
>>18019921Two randomly selected sub-Saharan Africans are less related to each other on average than a randomly selected European and a randomly selected Native American.
>>18019925No racial realist who knows anything believes that all of sub-Saharan Africa is "the same race". Next?
>>18019926>gradually less related to people as the geographic distance grew
>>18019926Two randomly selected Bantus are less related to each other on average than a randomly selected European and a randomly selected Native American.
>>18019929But that's wrong tranny and you know it.
>>18019940There's more genetic diversity among Bantus than Europeans/Native Americans due to a genetic bottleneck.
>>18019921Two randomly selected Africans are more genetically distant from each other than a randomly selected African and a randomly selected European on average. Genetic distance does not correspond with ethnicity and race, sorry chud.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11353042_Larger_Genetic_Differences_Within_Africans_Than_Between_Africans_and_Eurasians>Thus, Africans differ from one another slightly more than from Eurasians, and the genetic diversity in Eurasians is largely a subset of that in Africans, supporting the out of Africa model of human evolution
>>18019981>ahhhhhhhhh im just imagining this. racist cracker russian incel chud pseudoscience. ahhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!
>>18019981Okay now show the study showing genetic differences within Bantus.
>>18019925>>18019981>Two randomly selected dinosaurs are more genetically distant from each other than a randomly selected dinosaur and a randomly selected bird on average. >That means dinosaurs are birdsWhy don't you go back?
>>18019921It’s really a social construct in the sense that our society is based on a concept of legal equity and equality that prevents us from going into a spiral of barbaric, clan based revenge killings. Meaning that you have to be fair to your 80th cousin so he’ll agree to be fair to you and your 10th cousin. This does break down sometimes too, and it’s never pretty. So we all have a vested interest in being nice to each other.
>>18019921>Race is a social construct. Everyone is just as likely to be related to everyone.>If you have sex with your own race you're inbred.Pick one.
It becomes controversial when people misinterpret biology as political justification for discrimination.
>>18021260Discrimination, on some level, is important for survival though. Even if you think it's politically incorrect.
RACE IS NOT REAL STOP BEING RACIST
>>18021276no and also no
>>18019981That's not possible unless Eurasians were a mixture of genetically divergent Africans.>>18020021Birds are dinosaurs though?
>>180199252 randomly selected females have a wider height gap between each other than a randomly selected male and a randomly selected female. This means males and females are the same!
>>18021260True, discrimination should be far more refined than the obsession with scientific in the past few centuries. Thank you for agreeing we need even more discrimination
>>18019925Is that true or is it based on the claim that africa is the most genetically diverse continent ignoring the fact that most of these very genetically groups there are small minority tribes and most subsaharan africans came from West Africa 5000 years ago?
>>18019925Sub Saharan African isn’t a race. It’s like saying “two randomly selected Americans are more different than a random African and random Australian.”If we are going to be scientific about race let’s be precise.When people say “sub Saharan” they aren’t including the few million Pygymies and Capoids. They mean the Niger-Congo derived groups.
>>18019929No, they aren’t. Look at the FSTs for Bantu.
>>18019929An African village has more genetic diversity than all of China.
>>18023114No, they mean anyone who looks stereotypically black but there are people like that above the Sahara.
>>18023190>but there are people like that above the Sahara.What? Do you mean the african diaspora? Arabs who are mixed with blacks? Indians?
>>18019921>ethnicity and racethis is a shitty /pol/tranny thread, but anywayethnicity yes. its undeniably real and different ethnicities have fundamental biological differences. the most famous is the whole long slender east african marathon runner vs short squat european powerlifterrace is literally a spook. irish weren't white 200 years ago but now they are. unless you're going to argue irish people had a total genetic replacement in the last 200 years, race has no connection with biology
>>18019921This universalism hoax is a poison that can be traced back to the Jew St. Paul (Saul.) Universalism for the European, and race consciousness for the Jew who is nevertheless allowed to practice his nationalist and collectivist religion untouched in humanist and individualist Europe.
>>18023232>irish weren't white 200 years agoOf course the race denialist use historical lies for his arguments.
