[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: confederate.png (73 KB, 640x1200)
73 KB
73 KB PNG
It's mindboggling to think about how absolutely REDPILLED the Confederate States of America were. Will we ever see a nation as KEYED as the Confederacy again, /his/?
>muh nazis
Kek. Just kek. They had beta energy. The Third Reich was practically the geopolitical equivalent to a school shooter or incel. Gross! Yuck! How nasty.
Comparing them to the NORDIC GIGACHAD Confederates would just be an insult. The Confederates were LITERALLY ME.
>>
>>18024242
>Redpilled
English speaking Brazil sounds kind of shitty to me desu
>>
>vlodson
go down
>>
>>18024242
you jest but the confederacy got a large majority of the career US military and martial cultures of the pre-war era. Most of the mexican and indian war veterans went confederate. It was the very essence of badass stupid chuds versus the inevitable machinery of globohomo.
>>
File: trump-stay-here.png (32 KB, 350x232)
32 KB
32 KB PNG
>>18024242
stay here
never go back
>>
File: serious.png (124 KB, 640x1111)
124 KB
124 KB PNG
>>18024291
>you jest
I don't.
>>
>>18024301
I wasn't asking. I was telling.
>>
>>18024242
Now say this in public.
>>
>>18024242
As someone descended from Confederates on my Dad's side (Grandpa's side were regulars from South Alabama while Grandma's side were bushwackers of Walloon descent in Missouri), the Confederates were fucking awful and the Union ultimately had a better vision and a superior socio-economic and socio-political structure.
They built their entire society off of an exploitative, socially corrosive, unsustainable economic model that has to this day survived in the U.S (often using the same exact rhetoric the fire-eaters used regarding importing labor). The elites transparently treated poor Whites as cannon fodder while giving them 0 opportunity or wealth, and not even giving them an electoral franchise.
The Union meanwhile, had an economic model based on the skilled and voluntary wage labor of free White men working in an industrialized, organized nation-state with ample opportunity for social mobility. Sure, they also committed atrocities (more so than the Confederates arguably), but they had a far, far better vision for their society.
And I'm particularly bothered about how reconstruction went given they pissed away the opportunity to really bury the Dixie shit but pissed it all away.
>>
>>18024776
>They built their entire society off of an exploitative, socially corrosive, unsustainable economic model
it lasted fine for 250 years
>The elites transparently treated poor Whites as cannon fodder while giving them 0 opportunity or wealth, and not even giving them an electoral franchise.
Incorrect
Southern poor Whites were MORE socially mobile than northern poor whites. all the big wealthy slaveowners you pretend were aristocrats descended mostly from poor whites. andrew jackson was born in a log cabin yet became one of the richest men in his state from slave trading. same with bedford forrest
>>
>>18024242
I'll never stop being amazed at the people who seem to think the confederacy and the Nazis were based. But then have no commentary on the Prussian aristocracy in WWI. The Nazis are much more analogous to the union and the confederacy to the Prussian aristocracy of WWI and before. Pure Aryan bloodlines with striver middle class or mulatto hekin based aristocracy. Pick 1
>>
>>18024931
That's a recency bias. The north (and to a lesser extent, the south) experienced a depression some time before the war. The southern plantation owners were slightly insulated from that because they were land owning elites with a paternalistic attitude to their community. The north had a lot of free holders and frontiersmen and that type of community is not as well insulated from large migrations of people and economic down turns.
>>
>>18024242
This variant is such an ugly unfunny forced brimstone, keep it in your discord server ffs you autistic mongoloid
>>
>>18024249
But that's literally the modern day United States
>>
>>18024931
>it lasted fine for 250 years
Slavery is deeply toxic to any country that widely practices it because it creates a massive underclass of retards and an inconsiderate, harsh elite. That's a major reason why places like Russia, India, Africa, Brazil, and the Middle East are the way they are, while places that got rid of slavery early on like Western and Central Europe or Japan prospered and developed.
>Southern poor Whites were MORE socially mobile than northern poor whites
No they fucking weren't; my family lived on the same land in South Alabama from the early 1800s all the way up to the 1950s as poor yeoman farmers and only started to move up the ladder after they moved out West to Texas and then Arizona in the 1950s. The South wasn't even properly industrialized outside of a handful cities like Birmingham, Atlanta, and Nashville until post-WWII, and is only doing fine now because it was pretty much dragged kicking and screaming out of its thirdie mindset by the North.
>>
The Confederacy’s entire existence lasted just four years. Militarily they had brilliant moments, but they were constantly outproduced and outmaneuvered. Calling that gigachad is a bit like calling a sports team that had a flashy first quarter but lost by 30 points dominant.
>>
File: vlodson newspaper!.png (200 KB, 775x849)
200 KB
200 KB PNG
>>18025097
It's a beautiful, funny, and entirely organic gem.
>>18025671
I didn't mean militarily.
>>
>>18024242
It's kind of insane that the CSA turned the Southern US into a giant nigger factory
>>
Wall Street's first economic zone. Please stop playing with dolls.
>>
>>18025097
seethe
>>
>>18025572
Modern USA is Brazil lite. A theoretical independent modern confederacy is actual Brazil down to the demographics and culture
>>
File: ..jpg (259 KB, 1500x1500)
259 KB
259 KB JPG
>>18024242
>>18024301
>>18025704
it's cringe, just cringe, part of the appeal of these is that a few simple mspaint lines give an almost lifelike figure conveying an expression, but there is none of that here, it is too comical
>>
Why did the confederacy lose?
>>
>>18025968
>A theoretical independent modern confederacy is actual Brazil
I imagine it'd be more like Malaysia or Apartheid South Africa. No way in hell would they have desegregated.
>>
>>18024989
People who are obsessed with either of the two are myopic retards
>>
File: 1708465163503847.jpg (61 KB, 545x680)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
https://youtu.be/W8PO16yrsNk?si=VEQZA8ac_pDtUPLj
>>
File: 1624221826424.jpg (54 KB, 708x404)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>18024242
5/10 bait, try on /pol/ they're stupid enough it'd be 9/10
>>
>>18024242
HELL YEAK! KEK AND SHADILAY MY FRIEND!


Oh wait, they lost.
>>
>>18024242
stop forcing your gay memes here shartranny
>>
>>18026161
This poster is at least 30 years old
>>
>>18026161
>t. yankee
>>
File: 1586779954582.jpg (1.06 MB, 3500x2400)
1.06 MB
1.06 MB JPG
>>18024242

Objectively based and correct
>>
>>18027433
>>18026684
>Neo confederates when they tell amerindians they lost
Haha, loser
>Neo confederates when Yankees remind them that they lost
Oppressor!
>>
>>18029991
Did the south actually lose? the north was forced to readmit these people to the union and give them full rights. The north represents open borders and anti white globohomo while the south is still chilling in its intellectual superiority. Which is hilarious because people would characterize white southerners as unintelligent
>>
>>18029999
Now you're just being retarded.
>Did the south lose
Yes, twice
>Well the north had to readmit southerners to the union
Like I just said. Yes, the south lost.
>Bu bu but look, events 100 years later
Yes, the south lost again in the civil rights era. The first time was a net positive. The second time not so much
>Bu bu but those two things are the same
No they're not.
>>
File: Cherokee Rifles.jpg (432 KB, 1400x1400)
432 KB
432 KB JPG
>>18029991

And here we see the Yankee schizo talking to himself
>>
>>18024242

Only one side is saving pregnant Anne Frank and it ain't the Union
>>
>>18030078
>the south lost
>has to come here to say this because the only thing keeping the US together is white people and not some coalition of inner city illegals
yeah sure buddy, keep telling yourself that
>>
>>18030097
I have no idea what you're trying to say. Memes aren't arguments
>>
>>18030104
You're building a straw man. I never said anything about illegals. You're just making your side look retarded. I don't believe the stereotype of southerners being retarded, but you're not bucking the stereotype
>>
>>18030105
>Neo-Confederates must hate le Indians because the Hollywood propagandist told me so!
>>
>>18030107
The average inner city in the US is nothing but descendants of illegal aliens to the the US imported for cheap labor, that why you tards lash out at the south. Because you don't actually have any stake in the country you're told is yours (it's not yours you're an invader)
>>
>>18030110
>Pretending the same people who control the cities today are same ones who ran the country 150 years ago
I wonder if there's a new behind this post
>>
>>18030116
>euromutt spic nigger hybrid doesn't understand anything
you're a slave lol
>>
>>18030109
>This 1 outlier tribe that adopted our system of land own aristocracy totally disproves the broader point about amerindians
Really not bucking the retarded southern accusations
>>
>>18030117
No actually I'm a son of the revolution. You're living in the past and unable to go forward to the future
>>
>>18024242
The only thing Sherman did wrong was not continue on.
>>
>>18030078
>>18029991
>yeah Wypipo lost don’t call me nigga
You are a nigger and White people enslaved you. As a Northerner from New York I fully stand with my Southern regrettably Anglo brothers from the Southlands. Whites stick together.
You’re not White. You hate Whites because Whites are beautiful and creative and strong and you have an inferiority complex toward the greatness of White people.
>>
>>18030122
you're a sentient fart bubble is what you are
>>
>>18030125
I'm whiter than you Jamal. My ancestors built this country. And they didn't build this country to be an aristocracy of Englishmen. The puritans were right.
>>18030126
At least I'm living in the present and not tilting at windmills.
>>
>>18030136
living in the present where half the us population isn't even actually american championing political parties which are so unpopular they control 1% of the US landmass focused solely on the financial centers full of illegal aliens and subhumans
>>
>>18030119
>1 outlier tribe
>what are the Five Civilized Tribes

But more importantly,

>he thinks that if the South had won that warehouses full of surplus Snider-Enfield conversions wouldn't be mysteriously finding their way into the hands of all those Plains Indian tribes
>>
>>18030139
Nevertheless anon, you live today
>>
>>18030142
So you're basically a sportsball fan with no reasoning
>>
>>18030140
Now we're talking about plains Indians. Anon, whatever you do, don't look up the Wabanaki Confederacy. It will destroy your frame of mind
>>
>>18030144
>Now we're talking about sportsball
Anon, you lost. Not just the war, but the discussion as well. When someone snowballs their argument like this, it means you didn't have anything to say originally
>>
>>18030165
but you're the one that doesn't have anything to say?
>>
>>18030166
You don't seem to read well and appear like a poorly adjusted person. But then I am engaging with someone on 4chins in the year of our Lord 2025
>>
>>18030170
if you have something to say maybe eventually you will say it
>>
>>18030178
I'll summarize since you can't read: the confederacy wasn't "le hekkin based alt history vision of america".
>>
>>18030182
Well that's true because it's true america
>>
>>18030186
No, the puritans and quakers had the correct view. That is what America was meant to be
>>
>>18030187
quakers are literal communists, puritans are irrelevant outside of being socially retarded
>>
>>18030196
You've outed yourself as a yarvinite retard. Without the puritans America literally would never have existed. Quakers have a shadier history.
>>
>>18030206
>without the irrelevant religious radicals that never spread past the coast the US wouldn't exist
yeah whatever
>>
>>18030209
>Never spread past the coast
You seem to have an incredibly selective understanding of American history. Puritans, quakers, and their descendants also settled the Midwest, mountain west, and Pacific north west. Besides that, the puritans pushed hardest for independence from the British.
>>
File: W-Wowie!.png (1.5 MB, 737x1346)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB PNG
>>18030187
>backwards theocratic cults are what America should be

Yeah, I'll keep my separation of Church and State thank you.
>>
>>18030217
puritans didn't settle shit, and being the most belligerent assholes in the US probably isn't something to brag about
>>
>>18030222
>Didn't settle shit
>Founded half a dozen states
>Owned everything from Ohio to Minnesota
>Parceled it off and sold it to settlers
Yeah, clearly they had no influence on settlement patterns
You're literally retarded
>>
>>18030225
>founded half a dozen irrelevant ports
nice
>>
>>18030222
Ok, even I have to step in. The most belligerent ass holes in America are far and away the Scotts Irish descended southerners. This isn't even an insult - most of them are proud of this.
>>
>>18030230
poor whites were forced to live on the outskirts of society because the original settlers were given land grands of thousands of acres, so either you had to buy overpriced land from speculators or travel to where the land was cheapest. The land was cheapest where indians still raided people, this is why poor whites frequently called for the eradication of natives and even rose up against the colonial governments for not helping.
>>
>>18030237
None of that addresses the Scotts irish. This pattern was also not universal between the north and south
>>
>>18030244
you have no idea what you're talking about, you don't even know american history you just know some marvel avengers version of american history sold to you by a non-american
>>
>>18030247
Now you're just flailing your arms around.
>>
>>18030256
There was no great divide between north and south, the only source of the divide is new england and their self righteous holy than thou attitude which eventually lead them to push for the civil war
>>
>>18030260
>There was no great divide
This is wrong. There were huge cultural differences between north and south. While the civil war wasn't only fought over slavery, slavery was something that came up early in American history. The north did not suddenly wake up one day and pick a fight with the south. You realize a generation before then a war almost broke out between north and south over tariffs. Stop reducing the northern position into morality policing. You're doing both sides a disservice
>>
>>18030272
Yeah it wasn't about slavery, it was about money
>>
>>18030277
Also not true. Even you southern shills don't make that claim.
>>
>>18030284
It's definitely true, the northern industrialists backed lincoln because he promised to violate the constitution to give them eminent domain in the west, he also created a coalition of immigrants, a decent proportion of which were probably illegal, and even had his own private immigrant militias which prevented states from seceding
>>
>>18025977
no arrow



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.