>>18024766
I’m tired of kikes co-opting the word semite to make it exclusively about themselves when this is not the case.

>>18024766
Zionists very often teamed up with European antisemites whose goal was to dump the Jews somewhere else. The real enemies of antisemites were/are the people who want diaspora Jews to be treated as equal citizens.

>>18024766
>how is someone who wanted to kick out all the mexicans and send them back to mexico anti-mexican?
he wanted all the jews to leave britain and go to israel.

>>18024766
First off, people who claim to be Jews today have no connection to the ancient or biblical Jews or Israel. There are many more errors after that as well.

Second, semites include groups that don't claim to be Jewish.

Third, the prefix anti- implies that someone who is not a semite is claiming to be one. Did Arthur Balfour claim to be semitic? Fourth, if some article says a guy was an antisemite, does that make it true or does it only show that an accusation was being made which might not have sufficient evidence? i.e. Does the article say where this person claimed to be semitic and thus was a false semite?

Fifth, where did we establish the definition of antisemitic being a bad thing, or is it? I have yet to find out where the official definition is and the reasoning as to why it's supposed to be bad. Same for many other terms as well. I get the impression it's supposed to be bad, but without anyone ever explaining why exactly. It would clear up a lot if the people using this term clarified what it means, or else I would assume they think it's actually a good thing. We may have jumped to conclusions in thinking it was bad. For example, he could be both a zionist and a false semite without contradiction. But what would be the point of making this claim?

There are more problems beyond this, but these are the initial misconceptions here.

>>18024766
It's the same logic as Hitler and the NSDAP signing the Haavara Agreement.