What are the historic implications of the Nordic Tan?
>>18026171Basically all continental Europeans can tan. My grandpa was a Russian peasant and he got very bronze during the summer. It's more of a British thing for whatever reason that many of them can't tan.
>>18026176Some have said its an environmentally selected trait for losing tannability in Brits but can that happen in that timescale?
>>18026176I don't know if it's that common.Americans are descended from the British, and you only have to go to California or Arizona. Furthermore, my wife is English with a bit of French, and if it weren't for her phenotype, someone would call her Sicilian.
>>18026209>>18026206Yeah I just mean some British people. A lot of them on the other hand are surprisingly dark (they retained more prehistoric European genetics).
>>18026171>>18026206Volga Tartars look way darker than this on average, yet they are supposed to be "whiter than SOuthern Euros"/""Nordic""/""""white passing"""" or some shit like that, yet they are brown mestizos on average.
>>18026219brown looking brown shitskin people straight from Tashkent, yet they are supposed to be "white adjacent" or some garbage.
>>18026224And then you have the Crimean Tartars, who are supposed to be the REAL asiatic shitskins, ""Based"" "Stalin" for geocoding them! and yet they look like this, actually fully Europid and not a mestizo.
>muh obsessed off-topic schizoThis is a race-bait thread and my posts are as equally productive as the garbage above it, if not more so. Why did we ever make fun of Turks for not looking "Central Asian" again? This is disgusting. We should all be glad Turkey doesn't look like this now.
>>18026233It's really hard to look at those faces and not think "subhuman roaches". It's very hard to look at these faces and think "roach".
>>18026209>Americans are descended from the Britishwe wuz anglos n sheeeeit ya'll
>>18026240If we're talking in terms of overall demographics then Anglos have been a minority in America since the country was first founded, when people say Americans are descended from Anglos what they mean are its founding stock and cultural genesis come from Anglos.
>>18026246the US cultural genesis comes from africans and jews
>>18026240Oh and you got btfo
>>18026171They aren't white. Simple.
In premodern Europe, pale skin was often prized as a marker of aristocracy.
>>18026356less than 0.5% isn't 0%
>>18026171It seems that the only way to have a pale untannable Type I skin is to carry ginger genes. Blondes and Brunettes tan a lot but I could be wrong. I live in Russia and many Ruzzians tan a lot and look Brazilian despite of being pale blond (as kids at least).
>>18026171Historically? The same as every country in the world. Tan/darker skin implied low class laborer. Pale skin implied high class lazy ass aristocrat.
>>18027247>anglo-celtichow are those people """celtic""" if they don't cluster to original celts and cluster with scandis and dutch?
>>18027285The first undeniable ginger in Europa wuz CW-Yamnigger and it seems you know wazzup, my nigger.
>>18026176The British Isles are very overcast so the natives evolved to have very pale skin to absorb more sun.
>Go skiing >Need sunscreenit's that simple now delete your thread
>>18027247I believe that is the correct answer but its so strange that such northern features can have such an opposite reaction to the sun when compared to Germanic skin tones. Are gingers imposters?
>>18026206>British people don't tanThey do though
>>18026171If you have rosy white skin you are white.Middle Easterners can pale too if they stay a lot indoors, that doesn't make them fully >>18026171white.
