>We two dear men, friends forever, were here. If you want to know our names, they are Gaius and Aulus.
>>18027233>gayusChecked
>they're both burning in hell right now for being pagan
>>18027273Only in christcuck imagination.
>>18027273>right nowRead the book
>>18027273Only if they had the opportunity to hear the Gospel and rejected it. It's accepted doctrine that God doesn't damn those who never had the chance to hear the Gospel.
>>18027273Based
>>18027564>It's accepted doctrine that God doesn't damn those who never had the chance to hear the Gospel.What is the scriptural basis of that?
>>18027618I don't know that there is one, it may just be church tradition, but then again the list of which books are and aren't scripture is itself church tradition.
>>18027564>the best way to make sure people don't suffer damnation is to make sure they never hear the gospelThis can't possibly be correct. What's the point of a religion that's basically a cognitohazard?
>>18027632Well, no, to my understanding they won't be damned but they won't go to Heaven either, they'll just end up in limbo or something.
>>18027233A powerful message. We have no idea who they were but the mark of their friendship endures.
>>18027564Imagine actively spreading the gospel with this belief knowing you're consigning people to hell by spreading it. It's like people who genuinely believe in Rocco' basilisk purposely spreading it.
>>18027273Christianity is a mind virus.
>>18027233they were gay lovers and if you disagree you're a bigot and a chud
>>18027618>What is the scriptural basis of that?the Harrowing of Hell
>>18029130I disagreeI am a bigot but not a Chud as I live above ground. The basement is just storage and workshop because fuck tenants
>>18027233I came to argue with jews, not for the feels man
>>18029135but are you sure you're not a finngolian?Chud or Chude is a term historically applied in the early East Slavic annals to several Baltic Finnic peoples in the area of what is now Estonia, Karelia and Northwestern Russia.
>>18027273>*chilling with homer and herakles in limbo FIFY
>>18029130>Tacitus: praised the germanic tribes for throwing gays into bogs; called them noble savages and said they had good morals for barbarians>cicero: calls homosexuality an affront to the gods since it violates the perfect duality of man and woman>ovid: mocks gays in amores and says its the result of a weak and effeminate character, particularly prone to momma's boys >caesar: mocked the gauls for fighting in battle naked and implied they engaged in homogay activities; once threatened to assassinate a man for publishing a poem mocking caesar with allusions to giving fellatio to another man.>aurelius: opens his meditations by thanking his father for teaching him that faggots were weird and to control his lust>almost all accusations of homosexuality against nero and caligula were made by his political enemies and were clearly said to smear his character, whether they were true or not is irrelevant as it shows the romans as a whole found homosexuality detestable huh. funny how romans were all gay according to academics yet every roman author i actually read says "I hate gays and think theyre weird"
>>18029154Well, I guess Roman society had its pro-gay and anti-gay factions, just like present-day America and Western Europe. It wasn't completely one-sided, unlike the Christian Middle Ages, where literally no respected men ever publicly spoke or wrote in a positive way about homosexual acts, but it wasn't an LGBTQIAPZ+++ paradise either.
>>18029134That is apocrypha
>>18029154Cicero also wrote about how he viewed gladiatorial games as disgraceful, Seneca as well. Doesn't change the fact they were very popular among Romans.
>>18029154This only proves the opposite though, the fact that their is a vocal anti-homosexual faction with in a society indicates broader homosexual tendencies within. Cultures that dont have a gay problem dont even mention them in their writings because its so irrelevant and something you dont need to concern yourself with.
>>18029154Did you read Virgil's second Eclogue? Or Ovid's Metamorphoses? Or Cicero's De Natura Deorum? Or Martial's epigrams?
>>18029184No.Where was Jesus on Holy Saturday?
>>18027273/pol/ christlarping is such a shitty egregore
>>18029697Dead
>>18027233Now that was a good friendship. Shame that is rare these days.>no bro to duke out an apocalypse withYeah, i feel you roman-bro.
>>18029758fucking idiotgo follow suit
>>18029154and yet we have mountains of evidence that romans loved to pound bussy. perhaps the sexuality of people in classical antiquity is a bit different from modern sexuality?[spoiler]you're getting all worked up over a shitpost you /pol/tranny mongoloid lmao[/spoiler]
>>18029749I swear to God, they're like toddlers suddenly tumbling down into an evangelist congregation
>>18030254>mountains of evidenceprovide one
>>18030381What can you expect? They worship le hecking nords who are basically spiritual children along with you know whos.
