[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: image.png (2.25 MB, 2176x731)
2.25 MB
2.25 MB PNG
North Korea is poor because it lacks a port. Suezmax
>>
And?
>>
>>18032607
North Korea is poor because the leaders would rather have an impoverished population that is easy to stomp on than a prosperous one that could revolt. Nothing stopping fatso from going full China/Russia/Vietnam in making reforms if he actually wanted to.
>>
>>18032617
Obviously you're wrong. The Jews have a strong hold on your worldview.
>>
gdp chad is back? and with a new phone?
>>
>>18032623
Wtf does Ford have to do with North Korea you dumb bitch?
>>
>>18032756
The port issue is obvious.
The white race is based in areas with land. It's pure coincidence that the northern hemisphere has more land and a higher fractal value which causes elevation.
All users of his are American. All users of his are obsessed with black cock and lend lease. But they cannot deny ports.
Ports are caused by Europe having more elevation and fractal and this causes also resources.
>>
>>18032617
North Korea is poor because freedom isn’t free, everyone who broke free from the shackles of globohomo had to pay a massive price. What you wrote is just overused globohomo shill talking points.
>>
>>18032772
>North Korea is poor because freedom isn’t free
now, i truly see
>>
North Korea not having ports is a symptom, not the problem. North Korea getting a port and literally nothing else changing wouldn't make North Korea wealthy.
>>
>>18033860
Ports are compeltley a geographic problem. It's literally physically impossible for whatever your argument is to be correct.
>>
>>18033863
If every obstacle got in the way of every single one of those countries geographically, and they all got ports? Every single one of them would still be unbelievably poor forever.
>>
>>18033874
Of course you need other things. But for north korea ports are the reason, if it had a port and ocean currents it would dilute the wealth of South Korea and make both poor.
The Korean wealth just comes from ability to import fuel and vehicles to move goyslop to maintain density. North Korea has more rail miles and more infrastructure than the south. The only difference is the South has chinesium, goyslop and low quality imported materials.
>>
File: 64564564.png (318 KB, 1298x689)
318 KB
318 KB PNG
>>18032607
>North Korea is poor because it lacks a port. Suezm-ACK



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.