How could he win?
>>18032678There indeed was no physical evidence of Stalingrad after the battle of Stalingrad.
Dig down instead of trying to take Moscow 1941. Avoid the near collapse of the front that winter.
He would have won if his enemies just gave up. There is no world where he takes enough territory to force a surrender, so it all comes down to his enemies’ moral. In that respect, there’s basically nothing he could have done.
>>18032678I like the capture the British at Dunkirk instead of allowing them to slip away and then ransoming them for some kind of concession like a temporary peace
1000th post about this. He lost the war the moment he invaded Russia
Attention all anons.This man is not Mark (the original GPD schizo poster) he is simply just some fag larping as Mark. Mark an heroed himself back in 2023 (RIP). This homo on the other hand is just an imposter who desperately needs to drink bleach.That is all.
>>18032744Well done jidf. Jidf an heroed itself on October 7, 2024. The new jidf isn't able to report and ban static ips. No physical evidence for jidf.
>>18032744You sure?https://github.com/ingrahammark7/
>>18032765Jidf. You've won. I can make a push to the repo to prove you're jidf.
>>18032753You’re trying too hard dude.Where’s all the GDP = tourism posts? peak oil will kill all posts? or bronze can never win posts?
>>18032778I am at post limit. I did not buy proxy.
>>18032753>>18032767You will never be a memorable schizoposter
>>18032782You're correct jidf. His is a retard board and being remembered here is a fact I dread.
MODS do your fucking ‘‘‘job’’’
>>18032780>>18032784COPE you’ll never be him
>>18032791The mods here are a bunch of trannies and Indians. They'll ban you for saying mean things about poojeets and white people.
>>18032805You've won jidf.
Allies won by one reason alone. Manspam.England produced 100 million tons of steel. 10mt went to Germany. Kills require 1kj per m2. If you have a million men over a thousand miles 1 mile front that's 1000 per mi2. That's one per 2500 m2. That's 2.5mj per kill or about one kg of shell.At more realistic density spread over years that's one ton per.This means Nazis got up to 10 million artillery kills. It means that they were manspammed after a few years and could not hold. In such context artillery can delay the war for years but will ultimately fail. Manspam is the reality.His is a retard board so it's obsessed with infantry, bureaucracy and people dying. It never discussed tanks or aircraft and just goes over the deaths and political aspects. Nazis won ww2 and allies won in only the most base way that they initially came back, after losing compeltley in 1941, and slowly wore down the artillery.
Impossible.
>>18032678Sarin first strike and take a hands off approach to the Waffenamt and frontline reports.There is a world in which the Germans through tactical supremacy defeat the USSR
>>18032678by NOT allying with Italy or Japan.second to that would be to turtle and race into teching the nuke before starting a world war.
There's a finite number of about twelve possible replies to these threads that repeat infinitely.>Impossible >Use wmd or superweapons>Don't attack Russia>Take Moscow>No physical evidence for battle of stalingrad >Take oil earlier>Take oil later>Do nothing >Don't fight America>Dont use superweapons>Do use superweapons>Ally with Jewish elites>Don't ally with Jewish elites
>>18032698>1000th post about this. He lost the war the moment he invaded Polandftfy
>>18032678Have Mussolini get his shit together right away in Spring 1940, take Malta and hold the British back in Egypt. Close Dunkirk off on day 1. Move Rommel to Russia and start Barbarossa on time.I give his a 50/50 chance of winning under these circumstances.
>>18034015>start Barbarossa on timeit was started on time
>>18032678Unless he has reality bending powers, he has no chance of winning. Or just maybe dont go to war at all and just reform the state. And let it stand on its own merits..
>>18034015Malta was way too well defended and would of wasted precious personnel, going for the suez would of been way better and way easier.
how did your lawsuit against bank of america go and can we see it
>>18034202There was no lawsuit.
>>18032678Wait until the USSR inevitably invaded Europe so that the Anglos and French will willingly ally with Germany.
>>18034202This guy is a LARPfag…the original poster is dead
>>18034293This. This is part of why Britain and France tolerated Hitler's autism for as long as they did, they genuinely did not want to go to war with Germany because Europe at the time was scared shitless of the communist threat looming over them.
>>18034373Germany couldn't have done anything before the Rhineland remilitarization that they allowed
>>18032678Don't go to war with the USSR or USA. >USSR would have attackedIf history's taught us nothing else it's that Russians are better on defensive wars than aggressive ones. Let Stalin's low morale recently purged troops throw themselves at the Wehrmacht which HASN'T been weakened after years of Hitler launching invasions into Russia.>Oil shortageMake an agreement with Turkey to invade into the Middle East and you'll let them reclaim their Empire if they trade oil with you. The idea is not implausible, remember they fought on the same side in the first war, and Turks had a lot of bitterness towards the French/Brits for that. Historical animosities between Austrians and Turks were centuries old and were nowhere near as passionate as tensions from only 20 years ago
>>18032678"Announce" (don't actually do it) in Summer of 1940 that you'll be stepping down as Fuhrer in 1941, as 8 years as a Head of State is sufficient for any one person, and only a true tyrant would stay longer. Now there's pressure on FDR to not run for another term. Charles Lindbergh becomes POTUS and either joins the axis or at very least guarantees neutrality.>That's retardedIndeed. And it's still the best chance he had. There are zero circumstances in which the axis defeat the USA militarily; any hypothetical where they win requires at very minimum American neutrality
>>18032791they gave up on this board looooong ago lol. Unless it's literal cp or some shit. No one's getting banned from /his/ for off topic posting.>Proofs?Go look at the catalog
>>18033908unlikely, but not impossible. Lots of things that have happened in history (including Hitler's own rise to power) would have been considered impossible, except for the fact that it happened.
>>18034440>>If history's taught us nothing else it's that Russians are better on defensive wars than aggressive ones. Let Stalin's low morale recently purged troops throw themselves at the Wehrmacht which HASN'T been weakened after years of Hitler launching invasions into Russia.That wont matter, human wave tactics will still grind germany down, and ussr had a much larger industrial base. >Let Stalin's low morale recently purged troops throwNear the end of the war with finland the ussr had figured out modern war. They were not incompetent by that point.
>>18034124>Need to win in the Summer>The days started getting shorter on...day 2 of the invasionTruely genius, Adolf
>>18034133>Unless he has reality bending powershe did tho
>>18034453During the spring USSR roads are mud, If any invasion was going to happen germany had to wait till the summer when they were dry.
>>18032678Somehow ensure that the US provides absolutely no aid to any of his enemies whatsoever.The US turned the tide of the war and is the won who truly won it. If the US wasn't involved, then theoretically there is a chance for an optimal scenario where the AA line is reached and actually ends up mattering.Also not losing half the Luftwaffe in the battle of Britain with how little was gained from that, but that's more of a hindsight thing.
>don't go to war with the Soviets>don't go to war with Americait was his only win condition
>>18034555War with Soviets was inevitable but war with America could've actually been avoided if not for Japan and had Hitler refused to make the retarded decision of teaming up with that clown Mussolini who couldn't even beat a country as weak as Greece then he'd have more time and Britain switching sides so 2 big advantages for evil communist Russia that wanted to conquer the entire world back then that's the reason why even Putin went from doing business with Merkel to outright declaring WW3 in just a few months
>>18034543>The US turned the tide of the warIt did not, by the time the ussr got US aid, barbarossa was 4 months old and germany was out of steam
>>18034580If Germany was out of steam why’d it take the USSR four years (and lend lease) to push them back?
>>18034452Really they figured it out? That’s why they lost 280 divisions in Barbarossa?
>>18034596It turned into mostly a defensive war, but germany just did not possess the strength anymore to deliver a killing blow. >>18034597By the end of the war they had over 600. So those loses while alot, it wasn't even half of what they ended with. USSR just had such a massive population advantage.
Should have given Ukraine statehood under the provision they would fight for the Germans (which various Ukrainian nationalists like Melnyk were seriously proposing) to act as buffer against the Soviets, instead of holding onto retard ideas about lebensraum.
>>18032678By going for the major cities we gave the distance problem to himself instead of the enemy. Basically barbarossa should have concluded after the first few armies were flanked and captured and the baltics liberated. The whermact withdraws to half Poland and awaits the Soviet response. The germans were again completely surprised by their own initial success.
>>18032678He couldn't, game was rigged from the start
>>18034611By the end of the war the average Soviet division had 2,000-3,000 men, down from the standard 16,000-20,000 during Barbarossa.The Soviets could not afford any major campaigns that werent overt killing blows.The Soviets also lost air superiority toward the end of the war which would make any long term attrition war against a more defensively minded Wehrmacht vastly more costly.
>>18035185Which is why it had to be both capitalism and communism working together to crush nationalism. The only real socialism.
>>18035185>>By the end of the war the average Soviet division had 2,000-3,000 men, down from the standard 16,000-20,000 during Barbarossa.....The german division size went from 17k down to 10k, while Soviets were 10k, and went down 2-3k like you said they were not however 16-20k that is wrong. So basically germany went down the same amount...>The Soviets could not afford any major campaigns that werent overt killing blows.This is wrong, the ussr still had 7 million more troops than germany along with having a bigger industrial base which germany failed to destroy since they moved it into siberia. germany would been grinded down, they would need another operation the size and strength of barbarossa to actually win. And they did not have the strength to do that.>The Soviets also lost air superiority toward the end of the war which would make any long term attrition war against a more defensively minded Wehrmacht vastly more costly.This is also compeletely wrong like severely, USSR was making 40k aircraft during 1944, Germany had 4k planes by may 21 1944...
>>18032678Tardwrangle Mussolini to halt the invasion of Greece and Africa, focus on getting troops across the Black Sea (however that may have been able to be accomplished), invade and cut off Soviet oil. From there with their industrial might more or less crippled its a matter of the meatgrinder wearing out which becomes more hazy.
>>18034293>>18034373Stalin would never approve an invasion of Europe in peace-time. He would only pounce once the European powers have weakened themselves in a WW-1-style war of attrition but the successes of the Wehrmacht in France destroyed such plans.That is why the Red Army started to increase in size that rapidly in 1940/1941.
>>18032678Everyone here is saying germany couldn't win is wrong, Paulus literally almost took stalingrad in october with half the forces he was supposed to have and made chuikov have a nervous breakdown. By not splitting army group south in fuhrer directive 45 they would have taken stalingrad in august/september, no fucking way operation uranus succedes and with astrakhan taken the main oil supply(Volga) is cutoff and the soviets die of hunger in 1943. Germany gets the oil of maikop and grozny and by mid-late 43 they get the oil wells running and then they don't give a shit about oil shortages.
>>18036113Even if germany took russia, their fighting population was depleted along with most usable war material. US was on its way with a similiar population as the ussr. Germany could not fight at that kind of scale again.
>>18036124Big mistake for Nazis to not recruit liberated Slavs more than they did to the fight. But it was all very fast moving so no Nazi kicks the dust over it now.
>>18036406No amount of pressganged soldiers could stop the industrial colossus that was AmericaThe only scenario where the Axis wins is the one where they manage to keep America outside not only militarily but economically. The only way this happens is if he manages a peace with the western world.So pretty much, that's it. If he manages to get a peace deal with brits/america they COULD win.
>>18035885Soviet Divisions were small by 1945, having 600 divisions is more like 100 1941 divisions.>the USSR had 7m more troopsarmies dont work like that, those 7m were mobilized and actively working, they werent just sitting around waiting to be called up.>Germany would be grinded downunlikely given their 15:1 KDR.>completely wrong like severelynope. The fact you dont know this only shows you are a wikibaby.>making aircraft?????????Serviceable aircraft is what matters. Germany had more than the USSR by 1944.Its not Hoi4 where you can deploy whatever you have in store. you can only get a limited number of aircraft in the sky at a time and the Germans had more than the USSR till the final months of the war.read a book better yet google it and dont click on wikipedia.
>>18032678Better question: what if he won in the West and Britain peaced out straight after Dunkirk? What happens then?
