Ok, so how much of evolution would you say is actually rooted in reality?
>>18036232Most of it
Everyone leaves out the fact that we came not from ape, but from homunculus
>>18036232nothing
>>18036232all of itwhat part of it do you think is unrealistic?it may help you if you stop looking at it as "facts you must believe or else"no one knows exactly what happened, we are constantly proposing and discussing new hypothesis as more data becomes available. that's not a weakness of the field, it's just the reality of dealing with sparse and incomplete datayou're poisoning your own mind to resist some sort of dogma that isn't therelook at the image you posted. it's an overly simplified and outdated (was it ever not?) linear view of something that we understand to be more like a messy tangled web. you can probably burn that straw man easily. yes, some people who should know better may hold it up to you like "the truth". that's a flaw of those particular people, not the science behind it
>>18036232How can some people believe in evolution and also be religious?
>>18036525>homonculus>hugh mungus
>>18036432Evolution is fake
>>18037887>facts you must believe or elseSuch as the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis?
>>18038433You finally got released from the psych ward? That's neat, welcome back.
>>18038438Its probably a copy cat
>>18036232Evolution is fake.
Evolution is not goal-directed. Traits do not evolve for a purpose; they are selected because they happen to help reproduction in a given environment.
>>18038401Muslims and Christians just cope by saying evolution is a system designed and set into controlled motion by God. Jews have never given a shit about God's word in the first place, so it's irrelevant.
>>18038401I mean evolution doesn't disprove God, it does disprove that we were made in a day.
>>18036432Coolest monkey in the jungle
>>18038433Doesn't this pretty much prove evolution?
