Haplogroup I in Scandinavia is close to 50% when taking into account both I1 and I2 and the newest publically available and highest sample sizes
>>18045166>>18045166
>>18045166Norway should be around 40-45% too. And when taking into account population sizes where I1 is preferable we see a ~45% number or slightly higher close to 50%
>>18045172So yeah Scandinavia is near objectively half or more Non-IE paternally when taking into account Q, N, J, E and G etc
>>18045176So despite Scandinavia suffering depopulation when IE came, Ultimately more than half of our Y dna is non IE due to bottlenecks. We trace close to 50% Native European WHG/EEF Y dna when adding I, G etc.
>>18045166Come on, Billy.>>18045167Billy, Billy, Billy...tsk...tsk..tsk..
>>18045179And when considering our massive IE autosomals (~50%) this is more impressive
>>18045182You can model us as mostly Corded Ware (75%) yet we are over half non IE paternally. We are native to Europe unlike most.
>>18045184Billy, what the fuck are you talking about?>>>/sci/
>>18045180>>18045185Are you new here? Archaeogenetics are /his/-approved.
>>18045187Are you sure, Billy? Seems more like a /sci/ topic to me.
>>18045189Yes, look in the archives. Search terms such as "Yamnaya" "WHG" "EEF" "haplogroup"
Nordic Chads inseminating milk drinking tanned Yamnaya puss, pretty badass.
>>18045189kek you fucking retard the autistic math majors in /sci/ would start crying more than humanities students about haplogroups
>>18045184Corded Ware already has extra EEF and local HG input, Scandinavians are actually one of the cases where proportions of R1 y-DNA and Steppe/Yamnaya admixture are roughly the same, unlike most of Western Europe, Armenia, India (R1 > Steppe admix) or Balkan Slavs, Balts (R1 , Steppe admix)
