Anglosphere sexual "morality" is so bizarre and alien to me. It's as weird as the Quran's take on sexuality. On one hand it's simultaneously completely libertine and degenerate, on the other hand it's completely puritanical about age and the woman's fickle arbitrary feelings (and I guess it doesn't matter for the man). Just pick one or the other. How the hell did this shit even develop historically to begin with? It makes no sense.
Protestant distrust of communal ritual = sex becomes private choice.
>>18045978is sex a public ritual in catholic countries?
>>18045978But this is still upheld inconsistently. Such as with the age of consent, or the woman later changing her mind.
>>18045931Kill yourself unfunny soitranny. Back to pedocord, chop chop.
It got screwed over when blacks were used to degrade everything x100 times worse, duh
>>18045999I mean, not in the modern day. However, Medieval and early modern Europe did have occasional symbolic celebrations that could involve sexual symbolism, but these were largely folkloric and not part of Catholic doctrine.
>>18045931america was founded and built by puritansbritain went full-puritan by victorian times
>>18046009I don't give a shit about developmental limits. A woman is objectively more beautiful the younger she is.
