>According to Motolina, Nezahualcoyotl practiced his strict laws judiciously and imposed them on all his subjects. He killed four of his sons for their sexual relationships with his concubines. Conquered cities paid tribute that was distributed among three kings. Fourteen cities were under Nezahualcoyotl, including Otompan, Huexotla, Coatlichan, Chimalhuacan, Tepetlaoztoc, Chiauhtla, Tezoyucan, Teotihuacan, Acolman, Tepechpan, Chiconauhlt, Xicotepec, Cuauhchinanco, and Tulantzino>Nezahualcoyotl adopted the Mexica legal system into his empire to help in the reconstruction of his city. There were eighty laws that he enacted; among them were laws about crime and punishment including treason, robbery, adultery, homicide, homosexuality, alcohol abuse, misuse of inheritances, and military misconduct. For example, in the case for adultery, there were different punishments according to the levels of adultery and the status of those involved>Adulterers were stoned, burned, or hanged if they had committed murder because of their extramarital affair. The Mapa Quinatzin depicts the hanging of a robber for stealing or breaking into a house. In cases of military misconduct, for example those soldiers who did not follow orders or killed captives, the condemned were hanged or beheaded. Nobles, too, were not immune to such punishments. Sons who stole from their father’s property were suffocated. Drunkards, incestuous men and women, and homosexuals were hanged as well
>>18049966>I'm so glad we don't have to deal with that any more. Thank Yahweh for the Spaniards
>>18049966akshually, that was probably propaganda written by nezahualcoyotl descendants to make him seem cooler and holier by christian standards so that his family could potentially get more gibs from the spanish crown, they also claimed that he was a pre-columbian christian who rejected human sacrifice and other such silly things we know as a matter of fact aren't realother sources from the time actually suggest that homosexuality in the aztec empire was looked down upon, but not actively persecuted, and noblemen who could get away with it did it all the time
>>18050810>other sources from the time actually suggest that homosexuality in the aztec empire was looked down upon, but not actively persecuted, and noblemen who could get away with it did it all the timeSo the exact same as in Abrahamicism?Oh, you bummed a boy? Just pray for repentance and it's all fine.Or in the case of Islam, as long as the boy is cross-dressed as a girl and make sure you perform Ghusl "full body wash" after the act.It's all fine!Also, what is even your source for homosexuality in the pre-Colombian Aztec empire?I've never heard a single primary source on it anywhere. >>18050810>akshually, that was probably propaganda written by nezahualcoyotl descendants to make him seem cooler and holier by christian standards so that his family could potentially get more gibs from the spanish crown, they also claimed that he was a pre-columbian christian who rejected human sacrifice and other such silly things we know as a matter of fact aren't realBut yeah, this is 100% spot on.
>>18050835>I've never heard a single primary source on it anywhere.There are no sources from the actual pre-columbian period for obvious reasons, but there are many accounts from the contact and early colonial periods, when Mesoamerican culture was very much still still intact and living. The conquistadors regularly accuse the indians of practicing sodomy (though of course they're not exactly an unbiased source). While Bernadino de Sahagun's Florentine Codex, which has very detailed descriptions of Aztec life, describes the existence of homosexual men and the fact that homosexuality was generally seen as a bad and shameful thing, but not any laws dictating every fag must be tortured and burned to death.
>>18050929>There are no sources from the actual pre-columbian period for obvious reasonsYet we have primary sources on everything else.Although very rare there are ancient Greek pottery shards that do depict homosexual sex.Their low percentage of total finds (less than a tenth of a percent) Indicates that against popular opinion, Ancient Greece wasn't some heaven for homosexuals and that Abrahamics weren't the first to consider it bad. You have punishments like this for example that predate Christ by 400+ years.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RhaphanidosisAlthough we don't have the sheer volume of artifacts from the Aztecs as the Greeks we would expect at least five or so depictions to have survived if it was of any importance to the Aztecs. Evidently homosexuality was completely irrelevant to Aztecs.
>>18051036>Although very rare there are ancient Greek pottery shards that do depict homosexual sex.>Their low percentage of total finds (less than a tenth of a percent) Indicates that against popular opinion, Ancient Greece wasn't some heaven for homosexuals and that Abrahamics weren't the first to consider it bad. You have punishments like this for example that predate Christ by 400+ years.Where does this meme come from. There's about 1,000 scenes of pederasty on recovered Greek artifacts, and many more that bear inscriptions declaring some boy to be beautiful. Furthermore all their texts are saturated with the vile practice
>>18051045>There's about 1,000 scenes of pederasty on recovered Greek artifactsNo, there's not. No where near a thousand.We are talking about less than 50 known in the world.Also, in the British Museum alone there are 100,000+ ancient Greek artifacts. In the whole world there's easily over a million Greek artifacts.>Furthermore all their texts are saturated with the vile practiceLike where?There is no Greek god with a male lover.Greek history and mythology is the most purposely miss-represented in history.Mostly because everyone has a motive to do so. All Abrahamic and leftists gain from making the Ancient Greeks gay.
>>18051036>Their low percentage of total finds (less than a tenth of a percent) Indicates that against popular opinion, Ancient Greece wasn't some heaven for homosexualsNigga if you have a scene of dudes buttfucking holding your wine on your shelf then its obviously completely acceptable
>>18051073By that logic the muslim world completely accepted homosexuality because also drew it. They drew whole homosexual orgies. Take the Tuhfet Ul-Mulk manuscript for example.Also "my niggga" , ghetto slang is low IQ.
>>18051093>the muslim world completely accepted homosexuality because also drew itI mean yeah kinda, male sexual slavery and pederasty was extremely common and well documented in the ottoman empire, and in pakistan and afghanistan theyre still doing it to this day. Its literally become a running joke how gay the turkish are
>>18051045For the record, a lot of the examples of pottery in the ancient Greek style you see posted as evidence of widespread pederasty are actually modern replicas made in the 19th century and passed off as genuine by grifters. They were commissioned by ritzy pervs to fuel their LARP, you know the ones.Not to say it never happened, Socrates famously waxes poetic about the erotic beauty of young men.
>>18049966Based.
His harsh punishments for military misconduct reflect the Faustian spirit of the early Mexican people.
>>18051067>No, there's not. No where near a thousand.>We are talking about less than 50 known in the world.See pic related>There is no Greek god with a male lover.Zeus and Ganymede, Apollo and Hyacinth, Apollo and Cyparissus, Heracles and Hylas, etc. I can provide primary sources
>>18049966>He killed four of his sons for their sexual relationships with his concubines.Why would you want to fuck your own dad's sloppy seconds?
