If he drunk less alcohol, could he have become the fascist dictator of the British Empire?
No major political movement existed in Britain comparable to the Fascists that could have allowed someone, even Churchill, to seize full dictatorial power.
He was already the all powerful god-emperor of Britain if you believe half the stuff this place shits out about him.
>>18052421You're right, there's a lot of people calling him god-emperor.https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/Churchill%20god%20emperor/Oh wait it's all one schizo seething
>>18052421Literally the only person who calls Churchill a god-emperor in every thread is you
>>18052421Zoomer Historian is a retarded faggot, and you are also retarded for letting him live rent free in your head
>>18051041No.Fascism is a socialist ideology. Nearly all fascist leaders came from humble origins and were at first socialists before finding out that their real passion and allegiance was to the state rather than their class, which is the main difference between fascism and socialism.Churchill was a stone cold aristocrat born into the British bourgeoisie elite class of society so naturally he was a conservative and an imperialist. Britain in late-19th/early-20th century was extremely class divided and those born into certain families were basically given a free card to become the ruling elite (political or military) of society and immediately set on that track at early childhood. They could make a million fuckups during their political career and it wouldn't ultimately matter.
