[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: GkuV4KRX0AEwP-i.jpg (411 KB, 2048x1307)
411 KB
411 KB JPG
Will history judge Boomers for doing jackshit to prevent this while they could?
>>
>>18053744
It's funny how 90% of seethe on /pol/ is directed on mena while latinos are mentioned like once a week
>>
File: 9780199764334-1.jpg (96 KB, 500x755)
96 KB
96 KB JPG
>>18053744
Migration is a recurrent historical trend. It's inevitable.
>>
>>18053745
Because Latinx are based and bro-tier
>>
>>18053745
because 50% of /pol/ is latinx themselves
>>
Yes. The environmental, societal, and geopolitical consequences largely fall on Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z.
>>
>>18053744
Relax ami, rhodesia hang on with 5% of its population being white, remigrations are pathetically simple to do, if the right government was in power it could reverse this in 10-20 years, same in europe
>>
Err it's kind a necessary because, ekonomie and geopolitik. You can't let your country sky- dive in demographics and expect China India Africa to not use it to undermine your geopolitical position. White-shifting the latino and mena is the only long term sustainable solution that will prevent it.
>>
>>18054073
Tbh the correct govt can reverse it in 6-12 months.
>>
File: 1758033951960098.jpg (120 KB, 912x1005)
120 KB
120 KB JPG
>>18054129
Why should i care about being surpassed by china and india over the wellbeing of my own people again?
>>
>>18054134
maybe because if you don't keep your demo up they economically bully your country and there is always the threat of invasion. It's not that hard to connect the dots. If the other side of the world is hellbent on demographic growth and the west declines in the name of exclusion the power dynamics will massively shift and it will affect everyone. I also don't buy into the malthusian crap about overpopulation it's false. There are resources for everybody and far more. You basically lose nothing by having more neighbors. You lose far more by doing so, if not you, your future generations.
>>
>>18054151
*you lose far more by not doing so.
sorry.
>>
>>18053744
History will judge mayo monkeys for being soulless, immoral golems who sold out their own people for shekels. Good riddance i guess, even thought sadly their extinction isn't happening fast enough
>>
File: images.jpg (8 KB, 308x163)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
>>18054166
>>
>>18053779
inevitable once a people doesn't have the power or will to protect itself from it

>>18054151
the threat of military invasion is irrelevant in the age of nuclear weapons, so is the economy in the age of mass production of goods. It's easier than ever to be isolationist and to take your time to get the birth rates back to normal
>>
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/518313282



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.