*owns 600 humans beings as property*
>>18054780No pun intended but monkeyfolk aren't humans?
>>18054793Back then they definately weren't considered humans or people.
>>18054780Different time
>said irish people aren't all that bad
*rapes a child*
>>18054814Was he a jew? If so then that would check out.
>>18054821worse, he was a freemasonmost of the founding fathers were
>owns 600 human beings as property>rapes them>enslaves his own children borne from the slaves he raped>lectures the rest of the world about liberty and equalityTruly an American hero.
>>18054780T'was the style at the time.
Americans a truly a sick people
>>18054802>back then
>>18054802He considered them human enough to rape.
>>18054942I recall some snippet about jefferson calculating how much negro blood was in his children by sally hemmings (not much).
>>18054979>(not much)Bro must have been stupid because it would be 50%
>>18055010Think about this long and hard anon. I'm sure you will find the explanation yourself.
>>18055054>Hemings' mother was Elizabeth "Betty" Hemings.[1] Hemings' father was John Wayles, the enslaver of Elizabeth Hemings who owned her from the time of her birth.[2] Wayles was also the father of Jefferson's wife, Martha, making Hemings the half-sister to Jefferson's wife.Hemings' maternal grandmother was an enslaved African woman whose name is not recorded.[2] Hemings' maternal grandfather was John Hemings, an English captain.[2] Therefore, Hemings was of 3/4 European and 1/4 African descent, making her a quadroon according to contemporary American racial classification. This also means Hemings was the third generation of women in her family to be impregnated by a free man during her enslavement and the second to be impregnated by the man she was enslaved to. Man. wtf
>debunks the Sally Hemings fake news
>>18054814>>18054873He did not rape anyone! Little Sally was 14 years old and thats way past the ave of consent back in the days. And after impregnation he married her and made a honest woman out of her. Hes a real american man and you're just bigots!
Cool. Legend has it my clan sold all of ours to him and became the white trash legion we are today.
>>18054780I'd hesitate to call them human
>>18054942Fanfiction, never happened
>>18054780Look it was a different time. You with your libtard modern sensibilities wouldn't understand.
>>18055178False
>>18054780White supremes defending this degen deserve every bit of cruelty they're getting from the ruling jews.
He literally (literally) provided the framework for the eventual emancipation of the slaves. And loved them so much he had children with them. I expect opinions like this on Reddit, not here.I understand where it's coming from though. His legacy has to be shattered so people can never use inalienable God given rights as a defense against tyranny. Well played Reddit. Well played indeed.
>>18056475I believe in inalienable rights far more than Thomas Jefferson did.
>>18056475>And loved them so much he had children with themYou do realize impregnation doesn't mean there was any sort of romantic sentiment? They didn't really have any ways to prevent pregnancy back then and certain men would obviously be tempted to rape their slaves. Slaves were considered subhuman by many in society so he also wouldn't have any obligation to care for his bastard rape babies.
>>18056475If blacks want to live in this weird fantasy that a founding father fucked their great great grandma that's cool but I'm not going to subscribe to that
>>18056294Jefferson was a crypto Nog Blacks historically enslaved whites as sexual stock to sir mutts and obscure their bloodline resulting in a crypto ruling class with Black ancestrywhite people dont decide anything;the term "slave" means white for a reason- currently provided "house slave" accommodation to meet the script
>>18057617>Jefferson, born into a patriarchal slave owning family. Took to personal beliefs far out of line with the realities of his life.>one day in 1773, while at a meeting discussing the possibility of founding a government independent of the Crown, he launched a frenzied tirade against slavery in all it's forms. And the moral duty to ensrhine this in the constitution. As the group of men present at this meeting listen agahst. For they represented the wealthiest men in Virginia. Who just so happened to all be slave holders with the largest plots of land from Virginia and three neighboring states. By the end of the meeting they had decided to find a different representative.If he loved his wife he may have loved Hemmings. Or maybe he just loved making love to them.
>>18054780>>18054873BASEDI voted for this >>18054921GMS!
>>18057920>he launched a frenzied tirade against slavery in all it's forms.And yet did absolutely nothing once he grew old enough to realize it was the only thing keeping his wine cellar stocked and would allow him to autistically rebuild Monticello 30 times. Curious...
Dude Democratic gunboats.
>>18058394This nigga knows
>>18055089>This also means Hemings was the third generation of women in her family to be impregnated by a free man during her enslavement and the second to be impregnated by the man she was enslaved to.Why did slave owners love raping their slaves then enslaving their own kids so much?
>>18059988>Why would heterosexual men enjoy having sex with women?Indeed. 'tis a mystery we may never know
>>18059988Well if they're part black they're part not human
>>18059988>Why did slave owners love raping their slaves then enslaving their own kids so much?Its extremely hot. Imagine owning a person, being able to just rape them whenever you want, then taking her only child and raping them too, and to top it all off, forcing them all to pick cotton for you. fuck its really hot. completely psychopathic, antisocial, extremely terrible karma (will net you thousands of years in hell), overall just a fucked up and terrible thing to do, but nonetheless very hot. just stating facts
>>18054873>raping your own propertyYou are very stupid.
>>18060008but its your kid too
>>18060063Yeah man you would think it would make things different but humans are basically just animals at the end of the day and animals do all sorts of extremely fucked up stuff just because it feels good. If you already own the mother, a full human being, as a slave, it doesn't take a huge logical leap to say that your child is a bastard and deserves to be enslaved and raped too. ethical and moral behaviour takes more effort than raping, i think is another way to look at it.
>>18060058What exactly are you trying to say? raping your property makes perfect sense. Within a framework that owning people or raping is ever okay of course. it actually is the most justifiable way to rape.
>>18060084rape is morally repugnant and offensive, and bestiality is also morally repugnant and offensive. both are why race mixing is morally repugnant and offensive
>>18055166>He did not rape anyone! False, he raped people.>Little Sally was 14 years old and thats way past the ave of consent back in the days. But did she consent though? Being of age doesn't actually mean she consented.>And after impregnation he married her He did not marry her. He did promise to free their children when he died though which was nice.>Hes a real american manCorrect. Americans are child rapists.>and you're just bigots!Correct. I'm pretty racist too.
>>18060088I agree. perhaps Jefferson was morally repugnant and offensive too then, if not for the raping children thing but for being a race traitor.
>>18060084You can't rape your own property.
>>18060063Jefferson arranged for his kids to be educated and liberated (after this death).
>>18060108and after he popped their cherries
What will your descendants think when their entire planet is purchased?...Because the inhabitants are valued into that equation, if you can imagine.You do have descendants, right?...Right?
>>18060102Yes of course that is a reasonable justification. However it only works if you accept that humans can be owned as property.
>>18060112Absolutely no reason to believe that.
>>18060115True. Frankly its funny enough that he would have his own children freed only after his death. Raping them would just be icing on that cake
>>18060117Apparently his children were allowed to flee without being pursued well before his death.
>>18060133Even then that's funny as fuck. yeah my dad raped my mother when she was a child and then "allowed" me to flee. God, i love america
>>18054873Because liberty and equality is only for intellectual peers.Low IQs might as well be a different species for how differently they behave from middling and high IQs. Bell curve is a bitch.
>>18060095Some jew tarded retards claiming Tom was fucking the livestock seems less than credible to me.
>>18060142Roman fathers could sell their own, free, born in marriage daughters into slavery.
>>18060179And this makes it right and good and honourable
>>18060173Why? Even if there wasn't literal genetic evidence that it was the case, why would it be such a leap to say that tom couldn't resist a little bit of slave cunny
>>18060186That was 3/4 white, mind you.
>>18057751makes sense why this frenchie (white men in general) have a Black cock fixation, hes probably aware of where the bread is buttered you can almost see the giddines oozing out his pores
>>18060186>Why?because rape is morally repugnant and offensive, and bestiality is also morally repugnant and offensive. both are why race mixing is morally repugnant and offensive.I doubt the so called "genetic evidence". that sounds like some jew tard nonsense to me like your insistence that blacks are anything but repugnant
>>18060179No they couldnt.
>>18060198https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pater_familias>The pater familias had the power to sell his children into slavery
>>18060197>your insistence that blacks are anything but repugnantPlease point out exactly where I said anything like this.>because rape is morally repugnant and offensive, and bestiality is also morally repugnant and offensive. both are why race mixing is morally repugnant and offensive.Yeah, and? I already said I agreed with all this. But just because something is morally repugnant and offensive doesn't mean people won't do it and relish doing it. You need actual proof.>I doubt the so called "genetic evidence"Yeah well so what. I doubt you aren't retarded
>>18060208>In practice, the extreme form of this right was seldom exercised. It was eventually limited by law.
>>18060213I said they could, not that they often did.
>>18060179Men were the kings of their household back then. Now the state is the head of every family.
>>18054780All men are created equal was a rebuke of the divine right of kings, not a statement including racial equality. Sure he condemned the slave trade but that was because he thought the original sin wasn't slavery but having taken niggers out of Africa. It's why he never freed his slaves and he even pioneered the practice of slave breeding to replace the international slave trade.
>>18060221They couldnt, maybe in the archaic period but not in the republic and definitely not in the empire.
>>18060198>>18060224Roman society were the definitive reflection of the depravity of the ruling class if not forced to function under pretense and that "white" bullshit is window dressing by the Nog sbehind the scene to create false societal contextconsidering whites were generational slaves and concubine prior to being groomed as "house slaves" aka golemThese matters were defined before the white man entered the picture and given a bottle to suck on
>>18060194right and this an example of thatthe black/white bullishit is hegelian play for the pleb slave caste, methods of control and perception management niggers are behind the concept "white identity", the same way men were behind the creation of feminism as alchemical agents because all the Elites have Black Blood, considering its prerequisite for the right to rule simple as
>>18060242>>18060274you are the most retarded retard that ever lived
>>180549234chan isn't the entire world anon
