>The original Jesus movement was a Jewish apocalyptic sect, and what we now call Christianity is the result of it being hijacked, reinterpreted, and transformed by Hellenistic (pagan-influenced) Gentiles, especially after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE. New Testament theology (especially in the Gospel of John and early Christian doctrine) is built using concepts developed by non-Jewish, pagan philosophers - particularly the Greek idea of the Logos.Billions of people wasted their entire lives on this fake trash.
>>18054883>Billions of people wasted their entire lives on this fake trash.Don't get me started.
>>18054883Even worse. He was a junkie, rioter, pedophile and child trafficker. So exactly like modern Jews.
>>18054883
>>18054933Josephus himself is an 11th century fabrication.
>>18054938Josephus was the heteronym of Arrius Piso, a half-Maccabean RomanArrius Piso also wrote as Plutarch, Philo of Alexandria and wrote the Gospels of Mark and Matthew
>>18054943Heteronyms aren't real
>>18054943Stop
>>18054943Saul > Paul > Josephus > Yosef bar-Mathias > Joseph of Arimathea. Go look up the life events of "Paul" and "Josephus"......they're virtually identical in every way, right down to the time and place they have shipwrecks. This means "the historical Jesus" was the man who caused the Temple to come down, just as he predicted within His own time ;) Slam. Dunk.
>>18054883Jews who deny the resurrection should baptised, held under water until they either die or submit to the authority of the body of Christ.
>>18054883The apocalypse did come, it was the total destruction of Israel and Jerusalem in 70 AD. Apocalyptic in every sense, minus being the entire planet, which it doesn't say. Few survived and those who did became slaves.
>>18056241>The apocalypse did come, it was the total destruction of Israel and Jerusalem in 70 AD. Apocalyptic in every sense, minus being the entire planet, which it doesn't say. Few survived and those who did became slaves.Cope.
>>18056241that's not what apocalypse means and if it means just israel, then the bible only applies to whatever israel is
>>18056937Not in the slightest, this is a well-known position called Preterism and its very well represented among the early church.>>18056950>and if it means just israel, then the bible only applies to whatever israel isCan you elaborate on this point? It makes it quite clear that it's about Israel. Revelation keeps talking about Jerusalem and Jesus talked about the Temple being destroyed. Daniel before them had done the same. Miracles even ratified it: https://tektonticker.blogspot.com/2022/05/today-i-have-special-guest-piece-by.html
>>18054883Those flames just got hotter! :)
