[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1738797125381 - Copy.jpg (424 KB, 1920x623)
424 KB
424 KB JPG
What are the historical and humanical implications of the Volga Tartars being of Transoxianan (Tajik, Uzbek) racial stock?
>The original Mongol stock that came hither with Sayn Khan has disappeared, or been absorbed by later immigrants, and the language and type of features of the Tartars of Kazan are those of the Turki tribes that followed the banners of Tamerlane from the banks of the Oxus and Jaxartes.
Scottish Journalist John Geddie on the anthropology of the Volga Tartars.
>>
>>18055050
>Transoxianan
>(Tajik, Uzbek)
These are different races.
Tajiks are Iranians and do not have significant Mongoloid admixture.
>>
>>18055302
>Tajiks are Iranians and do not have significant Mongoloid admixture.
The Uzbeks are essentially a Mongolized variant of this brown race.

Again, What are the implications of such a race squatting on European soil, as in the case of the Volga Tartars?
>>
It could be possible. It's true that Kazan Tatars’ modern appearance and language reflect Turki groups from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and northern Afghanistan, linked to Tamerlane’s campaigns.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.