[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 0_r_5x7OZm9Q3eYJ7O.gif (38 KB, 450x317)
38 KB
38 KB GIF
Why did the left largely abandom materialist modernism for a metaphysical postmodernism in the late 20th century?
As a materialist, it genuinely feels like i'm talking a completely different language when engaging with modern leftists and so called Marxists, even on leftypol, where Postmodernist analysis and priori are just held as unquestionable axioms, and being a materialist modernist often gets you labelled as a " reactionary".
For me, it seems like post-modernism mostly forwards an extreme form of liberalism, so it's bizarre that most of the modern "left" subscribe to a post modernist framework.
>>
>>18055200
Because they realized power structures don't exploit just materially, by stealing your money and labour, but also cognitively, by installing particular concepts into your mind that lead you to act in their favour. So post-modernism decided to start challenging the seemingly clear-cut logic that the world uses.
>>
>>18055200
>postmodernism
Wtf does this word actually mean
>>
>>18055206
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/postmodernism/
>That postmodernism is indefinable is a truism.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.