How in hell did Gender ideology become so ubiquitous across the Humanities departments and academics when it's so incoherent, illogical and the ideas contradict themselves from almost one position to the next?Like, ignoring the politics of it all. The fact that gender ideology is so inconsistent and arbitrary and contradictory should have researchers and students rise an eyebrow right? But gender ideology is not only treated as just an ideology or theory, but as functionally an unquestionable truth across the discipline these days. You also notice that one week, something is an unquestionable truth, but next week that's slippery sloped and is now an incorrect position because something more extreme and radical has been adopted.A lot of my friends who studied sociology seethe about gender ideology alot behind closed doors, but they don't really bother to focus any of their primary research into actually testing it. So I wonder, how did Gender ideology become basically an axiom among humanities despite not really holding up to any basic logical scrutiny or review?
>>18055291The interests of the educational, media, pharmaceutical, and asset management industrial complexes converge; and all of these indeed have heavy-handed relationships with governmental, think tank, and intelligence support structures, which have worked to propel this ideology into the limelight. The illusion that western society owes all of its societal developments to a grassroots, "bottom-up" materialization of culture is breaking down, and joining this exploration is something you should be interested in doing. Interventionism of the sort has been very prominent at least since the U.S.'s cold war infrastructure was established.
>>18055291>You also notice that one week, something is an unquestionable truth, but next week that's slippery sloped and is now an incorrect position because something more extreme and radical has been adopted.Such as?
>>18055309Transexual medicalism was the norm, now it's you don't need to be dysphoric to be trans, but also they will jump back to transmedicalist positions when confronted.Gender and Sex are different, Gender is entirely socialized while biological sex remains which has now become biological sex isn't real. (basically nuked the new left wing party in the UK as well, when a founding MP said he believes biological women exist and caused the entire UK activist left to have a massive hissy fit and wreck the party)AGP isn't real and is really just a right wing conspiracy and terrible theory from blanchard, to AGP is real, most troons are AGP and it's totally heckin valid.Transexualism into Transgenderism into Non Binary into Xenogender, but loop back around and use those medicalist transexual arguments when confronted.Current shit fight over if Trace/Diaracialism valid in humanities journals.
>>18055315Gender dysphoria isn't found anywhere in nature, and even if it were real, there's an obvious difference between having a functional vagina and womb and simply cutting off your dick
>>18055291leftism has overrun education
>>18055339Most theoretical opposition of Gender ideology also though comes from Marxists and 2nd wave Feminists though as well.I think Troonery has more to do with the domination of post modernism than "the left" tonnes of early Troon movement was more tied to Lolbertarians anyway.
>>18055339Rightoids are too dumb by and large to dominate academia. Right wing ideologies thrive on having large masses of retarded people.
>>18055291high degree of birth hormonal control affecting the water supply turns male frogs into female frogs on the regular and cannot be filtered out using standard methods surely this has no effect on the humans drinking it
>>18055493Yeah, classical rightoids used to come out of history/classical lit departments but they don't even bother with that anymore because smarter rightoids that even bother going to Uni just do business management or law degree.
>>18055339Gender ideology is simply a way for privileged whites to reclaim power in a post-intersectionalist neo-hierarchy. All you need to do is dress more masc/fem than average for your biological sex and boom! you're non-binary and at the top of an inverted hierarchy of oppression. The fact that your parents are filthy rich and you've been privately educated and had everything handed to you on a plate suddenly doesn't matter anymore - you can claim oppression privilege over and above Shaniqua from the hood.As >>18055379 points out, this kind of thing infuriates real feminists and Marxists more than anyone else, as it completely obliterates their view of privilege and power. It's far more related to post-structuralist and post-modern discourse than it is to "leftism" as a whole.
>>18055291>iPower. The people with power and capital decided it should be there. The end.
>>18055291You have confused signifier and signified. Gender ideology is completely self serving and makes perfect sense in that light. It doesn't matter what the science says as long as it empowers people. This fits with the laicization of science, which becomes populist in the hands of people who can't participate in real science.
