[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


We all know what bleeding heart liberalism looks like (unlimited immigration, self-hate, pushing feminism and lgbtq) and to what it leads (anarchotyranny, rise in crime, police state).

But how bleeding heart conservatism would look like?

Which groups would it consider as matyrs and pushed to the public eye? What would be its effects ? Positive or negative ?
>>
Compassion would be selective, aimed only at those veterans, families, traditional communities, and faithful citizens.
>>
>>18056392
It usually joins into liberalism anyway as the more radical chuds push them aside from the right but otherwise, strict Catholic christian democracy (not the socdem Merkel bullshit version of it) is essentially bleeding heart conservatism.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.