does this help explain things /his/?
That's modalism Patrick
>>18057183>[Elohim = GodsThey created the world.Yes, there was Jesus and Yahweh and many other gods. Yes, there is an absolute, a source, a core, but the trinity is wrong.cope
>>18057210You're the same spamming idiot that posts retarded neopagan trash
>>18057183No, it doesn't. It suggests that the Father can "transform" into the Son who can "transform" into the Ghost. Like >>18057187 said this is called modalism/oneness and it is a damnable heresy. Try again.
>>18057187>>18057329why is common sense heresy in christianity?
*ahem*God is love.Also, it literally is that easy.
>>18057183no. Father - GodSon - What God says, his wordSpirit - The breath that God's word travels on
>>18057335Because the Trinity isn't supposed to be analogized
>>18057187>>18057329only if you're actually arguing the godhead is the same thing as the phases of waterits reasonable to use it as an analogy to help people 2000 years removed from greek philosophy understand what is meant by ousia and hypostasis
>>18057183okso what is the temperature at which the the father sublimates at earth sea level?
>>18057183You sure you haven't tried to simplify reality to a retarded degree, what about plasma and bose-einstein and fermionic and all the possible physical states on this list?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_of_matter
