Why has Academia been so harsh on Churchill so recently?
at the end of the day he was 19th century imperialist born in the wrong century that only managed a passable reputation because of him being the bong PM during WW2
>>18083552In the end good wins and evil loses.
>>18083552Academia is run by communists
>>18083552This is the future he fought for.
>>18083552English pride died in the 1970s. Churchill didn't have a lasting legacy
>>18083603what happened in the 1970s?
>>18083552>Tariq>AliBecause we started giving out Oxbridge places to monkeys in some misguided attempt at getting them to like us.
>Ali's father and mother were cousins,
>>18083699>>18083714kek
>>18083581You wish lmao
>>18083607School of Frankfurt, the 68 movements and other anti-european, anti-christian and anti-tradition cultural movements took root
>>18083552Churchill made sure his pre ww2 and early phases of ww2 letter exchanges with Mussolini were sedtroyed and Mussolini himself killed by MI6, therefore the only good parts about him were deleted from official history
>>18083552Winston Churchill wasnt particularly loved or liked by the Brits. He lost after the war afterall. He was seen as old conservative by the liberals and a zionist by the reactionaries. I genuinely believe a lot of "cult" comes from american media, he was pro zionism and half american. So popular media has him as the only important figure in Britain in ww2. That combined with ww2 really only being studied through the jewish lens in the UK i.e the holocaust and how bad the nazis were most British people wouldnt know any other British leader or general of the time. For instance Montgomery was very popular after the war and well known. Now? Barely known let alone less famous generals
>>18083552It's a natural consequence of the ideology he promoted. Anglo-jewish liberalism will always turn on its previous champions for not going far enough. From parliament to the continental congress, and from Churchill to modern leftists.
>>18083552They can't handle a GIGACHAD who actually won a war because he wasn't a feelings-driven leftoid. They'd rather cry about some shit that happened 100 years ago than admit one absolute unit saved civilization from the Nazi death cult.
>>18083552He served their purpose painted as a winner, now he will serve their purpose painted as the loser. Such is the fate of all who ally with Bolsheviks, Zionists, Bankers, and subversive Jews.
>>18084366I think the modern left cant understand how someone can be very conservative but oppose the nazis and fascism. Its an incomprehensible to them
>>18083552Mommy and daddy issues.
>>18083552Because the fault for the second world war in no small part rests on his shoulders, he might've just been an instrument but that doesn't make him any less complicit in a war which killed 70 million people. People also like Hitler now.
>>18083552Never understood the praise for him, continuing the war is easy for politicians.
