[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why don't we call them Moslems or Mohammedians anymore.
>>
Moslems are not real.
>>
>>18101316
We call them Zuttsluts now.
>>
>Moslem
Further from the original pronunciation and sounds weird
>Mohammedan
Is like calling Jews Mosesian
>>
Or Muselmans. Or mehemedians. Muslims have some kino pronouciations
>>
>>18101321
>calling Jews Mosesian
Kino.
>>
>>18101324
Mossadian
>>
>>18101324
No it's a stupid convention. Christians by that logic should be called Jesusians or Paulians which funnily enough are opposing beliefs
>>
>>18101337
Paul reads like Ben Shapiro.
>>
>>18101337
>Jesusians
That's literally what Christian is you retard. Also Jesusian is kino too anyway
>>
>>18101353
>the name Iēsous comes from Hebrew/Aramaic and means "healer or physician, and saviour," and that the earliest Christians were named Jessaeans based on this name before they were called Christians. This etymology of 'physician' may derive from the sect of the θεραπευταί (Therapeutae), of which Ephanius was familiar.[17]
No it's not. His name wasn't anointed one.
>>
>>18101369
>the earliest Christians were named Jessaeans
Kino.
>>
>>18101321
>Is like calling Jews Mosesian
Those who claim to be Jews today have no connection to the ancient or biblical Jews.
>>
File: IMG_1203.jpg (1.21 MB, 1170x1415)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG
>>18101316
We should, they sound cool. There was also 15 different ways to spell both terms. Imagine calling a Muslim a Mahomettan, just sounds way cooler
>>
File: Muhammad the Goddess.jpg (237 KB, 1002x1024)
237 KB
237 KB JPG
>>18101316
>Zuttislam
Since the Zutt slam of prophet Muhammad became public they changed their name to Zuttslam.
>>
>>18101324
>>18101337
That's literally how the Ottomans referred to Christians and Jews
>Isevi
>Musevi
>>
>>18101473
You see the vision
>>
>>18101322
For me it's "mahometan". I also had a university professor who called them mozlems a couple years back.
>>
>>18101544
>mozlems
Hell yes
>>
>>18101321
>Is like calling Jews Mosesian
you make it sound as if this was somehow wrong.
>>
>>18101316
Mohammedians has a nice ring to it
>>
I like Ishmaelites
though technically that lumps them in with arabs
>>
>>18101322
>Muselmans
R*ssians still call them that. You wouldn't want to share a common thing wirh r*ssians, now would you?
>>
File: islam5.jpg (924 KB, 800x3378)
924 KB
924 KB JPG
>>18101316
ZUT ALORS!!
this is the best
http://www.google.com/search?q=prophet+of+doom+craig+winn
>>
>>18101316
Globohomo is for some reason absolutely infatuated with these inbred pedophile worshippers so they are above any criticism and have to be coddled at every turn.
>>
>>18101316
Theyre like trannies in that they kill themselves id you dont call them exactly what they want
The difference is they also kill others. Which trannies have started to do now too
A fragile people, not serious in the slightest
Muhammad had his moon split by the zutt nutt
>>
>>18101337
Only flawed interpretations pit them against each other.
>>
>>18101316
I usually call them mohammadans because it is my understanding that it upsets them.
>>
>>18101337
>Jesusians
Christian is literally a form of that, christ is a name for jesus
>>
My dad still pronounces it "moslem" lol

But I thought the point was that we dropped "Mohammadan," akin to Arians or Nestorians, when we stopped classifying them heretical Christians and as their own separate religion.
Which begs the question of when a denomination becomes a religion.
>>
>>18101322
In French it's still "musulmans"
>>
>>18101321
>Is like calling Jews Mosesian
makes no sense historically speaking as they don't even follow Moses. Otherwise they'd be Christian
calling jews Molochian would be more appropriate in the context of the babylonian talmud
>>
>>18102532
Now that I think of it, Samaritans are the real Mosesians since they reject all prophets post-Moses.

So what, modern-day Jews are Malachites, since he's the last prophet?
>>
>>18102572
Samaritans and Kariates are different
talmudists are virulently anti-Christian that's why they are of the Antichrist
Whether the Antichrist will be called Moloch or Baal is irrelevant
Both are grandiose titles so you can expect the Antichrist to be extremely proud and haughty
>>
In Sweden they're actually called "brownbuns", not as a slur or anything, but because when the vikings encountered them in the middle ages they were brown and curved over like buns when they prayed.
>>
>>18102600
The vikings called them serker, i.e. saracens. Later they were called muhammedaner and musselmaner, today muslimer. Never heard of brunbullar or any other word that could be translated as "brownbuns".
>>
>>18101539
Yes
>>18101544
Moslem/Mozlem is another great one



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.