If Christianity were truly a religion OF slaves, as traditionally thought, like Nietzsche, it wouldn't say things like "If your master beats you to death, bow your head and endure it, because your reward will be in the next life."Christianity was clearly created by the elite to preach resilience and submission to slaves. In other words, it is a religion FOR slaves, not BY slaves. It was created by the Roman elite to be preached to illiterate slaves and peasants who were completely ignorant of how nature works."Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, for when he has stood the test, he will receive the crown of life." James 1:12.If it were a religion OF slaves, created by slaves and marginalized and impoverished groups, it would preach things like "we have to rip the heads off those Roman slave-owning bastards and hang them in the forum."It was clearly created by the elite, who controlled writing in the Empire, to APPEAR as if it originated from the common Jewish people and not from the elite itself. They even invented persecutions to legitimize it as a religion originating from the oppressed classes.The Roman elite were masters of literature and did these things easily.
>>18102519Today, it is known that 10% of the inhabitants of the Roman Empire had converted to Judaism.The famous anti-Zionist radio host Kim Iversen exposed this research by stating that not even the Jews of the Roman Empire had anything to do with the Jews of the Old Testament because conversions to Judaism were common at the time, and even Nero had converted.Among these converts to Judaism, an anti-slavery sentiment grew, comparing slavery under the Romans to slavery in Egypt.The imperial elite and their Maccabean allies, such as Agrippa I, Agrippa II, and Berenice, were reportedly very wary of this because they lived in fear of a new slave revolt on the scale of the Spastacus Revolt and decided to destroy the Jewish capital of Jerusalem.They did everything they could to provoke the Jews, such as stealing the temple treasury and placing statues of Roman gods there, until the Jewish rebels reacted and gave the Romans a justification to invade Judea and massacre the Jewish leaders.Just like the US does: they provoke, provoke, and then invade when the provoked react.Obviously, Christianity was born and fed by this desire of the Roman elite to control the empire's slaves and serfs.It's a religion that clearly preaches submission. Clearly and visibly.Why would groups of poor Jewish slaves create a religion that preaches that these same slaves and poor people passively submit to Roman authorities?Literally a messiah who takes the beatings of the Romans in silence and with his head bowed, and then a certain Paul who says that the supposed creators of the religion should submit to their masters.A religion of masochists, is that it?This traditional view of Christianity makes ZERO sense. No sense. Nothing.
>>18102519Why did the name FLAVIUS become more important than the name Caesar after the Romans converted to Christianity?Not only did all Roman kings and emperors adopt it, such as Flavius Belisarius and Flavius Zeno, but also Germanic conquerors such as Flavius Odoacer and Flavius Theodoric adopted the name Flavius.The first Frankish king, Clovis I, was Flavius Chlodovechus.Why did the name Flavius become more important than the name Caesar after the Christianization of the empire?
>>18102519
