>there's a good chance we live in a simulationIt's over
Zero evidence. Could just as well believe in Iwakura Lain.
>>18104581>Zero evidence.Because you don't like paying attention to bad news
>>18104607What news? Stop playing charades.
>>18104621You're playing charades!
everything is fake until proven gay, then it becomes fake and gay. That's it, that's the ancient wisdom.
>>18104572doc says I need a cpap machine>dang
>>18104572If the simulation is a 1:1 copy of reality complete with permadeath, then what is the actual discernable difference or meaningful implications of just accepting the matrix?
>here's your rational scientific atheism bro
>>18104607the bad news is that you listen to retarded bad faith atheist philosophers, yes.
>>18104607>If you disagree that there’s any significant probability that this is true, you’re simply afraid to confront the realityOkay, I’ll bite even though you weren’t replying to me. What’s the bad news? What’s so horrifying about it? If I was confronted with undeniable evidence that we lived in a simulation tomorrow, my first reaction would be to be extremely impressed with its creators. It wouldn’t challenge my beliefs, because even though it would mean that the God I believe in doesn’t really exist, it would also be a major relief because I’d immediately know who the real God was, or Gods. The creators of the simulation. I’d be greatly impressed with the whole operation and how there’s no obvious cracks in it. Why would it be bad news? Does it somehow make our lives less significant? I don’t think so.
>>18104572Even if we did, so what? It changes nothing.
>>18104572haha OP I love froggo XD
> Watches youtube videos on how we are in a simulation> Doesn't examine the evidences> Sucks Neil D'greg Tyson's dick> Is incapable of judgement> Believes that free will does not existOP is a retard. Dont be like OP
>>18104572I'm pretty sure I'm an experiment and everyone else is fake. An endurance contest that revolves around how much I can tolerate
