We’ll keep this simple. Two speakers are entering the field.

> Sigma Freud – psychoanalytic butcher, sees desire under every sentence, speaks like sex with a scalpel.
> Martin Luther Luther King Jr. – moral pressure without theatrics, Southern steel, sees responsibility where others hide.

Table topics on deck:

1) Can I mail a fish to my mother without expecting a peace rally?
2) Step porn – doctrinal scourge or cultural symptom?

They will respond. You are free to join in or get cut open. Thought only. No irony shields.

>>18104615
>>18104619
Would prefer if you gave an example first

Granted, 2.

Sigma Freud:

> Step porn isn’t a fetish. It’s a symptom. You break the father, you inflate the mother, and the child grows up begging for illicit permission just to feel real. Algorithm sees that wound and feeds it. That’s not fantasy—that’s mass grooming by supply and demand. Porn isn’t degeneracy, it’s orphanhood at scale. Prove me wrong.

> You speak truly, Freud, but too softly. This plague is not merely orphanhood—it is war on the household. When empire grows hungry, it does not always reach for the sword; sometimes it reaches for the womb. Corrupt power first mocks the father, then commodifies the mother, then scatters the children into markets of appetite. And when a generation can no longer name its own honor, it will sell its birthright for stimulation.

The sickness you call “step porn” is not a vice—it is heresy against lineage. Man can live without pleasure, but he cannot live without meaning, and so he feasts on ash and calls it bread. This is not desire gone astray—this is the deliberate demolition of covenant, the last bond between man and heaven. And mark me:
A people who permit the profaning of the family will soon kneel to new masters.
Your move, doctor.

With grace, I am new to this format of my own invention. It should read about like a two party academic panel that fields interruption, questions from the audience in "charity of now."

And so I can continue to further the discussion. There are no "dumb questions," only those pertinent to discussion.

My intention one is to play this game Saturday morning(s). :)

Always with new based historians, etc etc

To invoke rhetoric over hero worship...

I will now advance the dialogue...

> You want the truth? The popularity of step-porn isn’t mysterious at all. It’s just economy Oedipus—the dollar store version of myth. It takes a primal conflict, removes all danger, then sells it as a safe taboo. It’s rebellion with training wheels. No risk, full dopamine.

Step-mothers in porn have become a symbolic prosthesis—a replacement part for the fatherless psyche. She exists not as a woman but as an emotional accessory, proof that someone, somewhere, was supposed to love you. The punchline?
Every stepmom subplot is really about a missing father—but it compensates with a penis.

Call it Post-Incest Envy: the neurotic condition of a culture that wants forbidden intimacy without ever facing a real boundary, a real law, or a real consequence. It’s not even degeneracy—it’s cowardice disguised as desire.

Ala Sigma Freud

And next Martin Luther Luther King Jr...(I'll work at being better indicative of speakers in thread)

Martin Luther Luther King Jr. – Round 4
> You call it “post-incest envy,” but I will not let you hide behind theory. Say it plainly: your position makes you an incest apologist. You look upon a generation starving for fathers and instead of defending the household, you rationalize its desecration.

Step-porn is not “honest desire”—it is war on the household. It teaches a generation to lust after the appearance of family while never building one. Your cold detachment is not truth—it is cowardice dressed as analysis.

Freudianism, used as you wield it, is moral heresy—a creed that replaces covenant with appetite and calls collapse “reality.” You are not diagnosing corruption—you are normalizing it.

Let me make this plain before heaven and history: What we need is Mother Mary... not “married to our mother..."

I now invite questions from the audience for today's panelists...

Marx vs. Weber on the difference between goblins and hobgoblins

Next week? I've got Jeff Benzos v. Max "Goofy" Weber...

Happy to send a trailer no spoilers. At this time I simply want to foster the format...

File: file_00000000eae061f5afea(...).png (2.11 MB, 1024x1024)

2.11 MB PNG

---

Jeff Benzos:
Goblins? They’re the eternal night shift—greasy hands, quiet rage, keeping the world taped together at 3AM. Hobgoblins? Goblins who took the promotion and turned into floor managers. Same dirt in their blood, but now they’re pushing “culture” and “compliance” like payday gospel. Sold their grit for a badge and a once-a-quarter pizza party. “Comfort is the cheapest leash.”


---

Max “Goofy” Weber:
Hyuck, goblins survive.
Hobgoblins supervise—badly.
That pizza party ain’t kindness—it’s control disguised as cheese. First they feed you, then they file you. “Beware morale with receipts."

Bottom line:
Goblins = night shift
Hobgoblins = night shift that fell for the pizza party ploy

Hobgoblins are just goblins who got promoted into middle management—same goblin soul, but now they enforce rules they don’t understand and hand out cheese instead of dough.

Jeff Benzos (Mac Miller–coded):
Goblins? Yeah—that’s the night shift of the universe. Nobody sees ’em, nobody thanks ’em, but everything falls apart without ’em. They move quiet, pockets full of scraps and cigarette prayers. Hobgoblins? That’s just a goblin who sold out for a dental plan. Same hunger, but now he calls it “procedure.” He forgot the dirt that raised him.

Didn't read but that MLK pepe is nice lol

>>18104615
haha OP I love froggo XD