How would you react if atheists barged into your house and told you to believe in the science or you die?(This is kind of what happened in the French Revolution where they killed anyone who wasn't "enlightened" enough)
>>18104730Never happened. Christkikes are like kikes in all regards, including fake genocides.
>>18104735So this didn't happen?
> The spectacle is always the same: people who cannot build meaning stage a raid and call it enlightenment. Whether it’s activists rewriting language or ideologues storming a sacred space, the move is identical—occupation by moral performance. It isn’t truth. It isn’t justice. It’s theater for people who panic in silence.Real enlightenment once required formation—discipline, apprenticeship to reality, time in the furnace. But wokism wants salvation without transformation. It swaps initiation for accusation, craft for sentiment, and responsibility for hashtags. It doesn’t develop people—it deputizes them. Awareness is its cheap counterfeit for consciousness: awareness just sees; consciousness chooses.Nature abhors a vacuum. Souls do too. When meaning erodes, something always rushes in. That collapse of inner structure creates a moral sinkhole—what I call reverse invagination—the boundary caves inward and the outside invades the interior. That’s why ideology today behaves like a parasite. It doesn’t persuade—it occupies.Understand this: boundary is not violence. Containment is not cruelty. Ritualized self-defense is a requirement of any living order. Roosevelt had it right: speak softly, carry a big stick—hold your ground without hysteria. Vollmann saw the same truth: coercion is the last tool of the hollow. Those who lack inner law try to become the law of others.Modern ideological performance wears many masks—some burn books, others police pronouns, others wage holy war against memory itself. Different costumes, same hunger for power. None of it is moral. It is ethical cosplay—the appearance of conviction without the cost of becoming someone worth listening to.So here’s the posture: Build quietly. Guard what is sacred. Invite honest struggle. Reject moral theater. Let invaders find the boundary—and let the boundary hold. Stop and smell the popcorn.
*has entered the chat*
Science is not the tool of atheism; science is a tool of faith. The empirical method assumes reality is intelligible, stable, and responsive to disciplined inquiry—those are metaphysical commitments, not lab results. Every experiment begins with a leap before the data: the belief that causes are real, that nature is coherent, that repetition reveals truth rather than chaos. That isn’t anti-faith—it’s the operational form of faith. What atheism calls “neutral” science actually rests on relational trust between mind and world. When that trust breaks, you don’t get reason—you get ideology or nihilism. Even Kierkegaard knew this: truth requires a leap of faith—or as his based cousin Kekkegaard clarified, “you can’t cross the pond of reality without leaping lilypad to lilypad—that’s called empiricism.” The problem isn’t science; it’s amputating science from the larger field of meaning that gives it direction. Faith isn’t anti-science—faith is the condition of science. You have simply put de cart before de horse.
>>18104748They guillotined a few people, not huge swathes of Christkikes and not for being Christkikes. In the same way the Third Reich shot some people but that didn't make the Holocaust real.
>>18104844>a is not b; a is c>that isn't x—it's y>you don't get f—you get g>the problem isn't m; it's n>p isn't q—p is rWill someone please teach the AI a new way to write sentences
I'm sorry, do you have a question or suggestion for my robot?
>>18104852Lies
I'd plant claymores at every entry point.t. atheist who despises atheists
I'm also open to a formerly weighted topical response alongside abberant criticism of my hybrid doxology...AI is a mechsuit, but I've got my ethical hands on the crank. Admit it. You're just jelly of my kechsuit.
>>18104730I'd start blasting.
Florida Man! A fellow GatorBoi!
But what if it's just the Jdub, homie?
>>18104730I would do what no one else did and listen to them
Bravo.