wh*Tes told me that Turks were just GreeksTurns out wh*Toids were wrong.
>only crack more than 50% once with 'possibly' Turkic includedHumiliation ritual
>>18105352>Europeans are only 40% Yamnaya therefore Europeans are EEFwh*Toid IQ
>>18105341Turks aren’t Greeks, except in very few number. However, they are the descendants of Indo-European VVHITE Anatolians who were Hellenized before being Turkified. They have admixture from Native Anatolians, Greeks, Bulgarians, East Slavs, Circassians, Bosnians, Armenians, Bosniaks, Albanians, and other whiteys I’m too lazy to think of right now. It’s also worth noting that the “Turkic admixture” is counting admixture from medieval Oghuz Turks, who were already half Caucasoid, if not more. So the actual amount of pure East Eurasian DNA is like 0-20% in most areas. “TVRKS” are CAVCASOIDThe map I have here depicts the actual amount of chinkoid admixture they be do having fo real. As you can see only some Tyrks are east asian who should go to MONGOLIA
If you weren't a Turk yourself trying to push propaganda you would realize that "Turkic DNA Project" is unreliableHowever, Turks are not really that similar to Greeks on average. They cluser closer to Caucasians and Arabs. But it's also a regional thing, considering Turkey is a patchwork of mutts.I think the Turkic influence can be estimated at most to 15%. "Medieval Turkic" is a cope definition.
>>18105362>To deduct the European admixture in Argentina you need to use Yamnaya, not Spanish and Italian sampleswh*Toids...
>>18105354>muh pottery culchursSilence, dancing boy
>>18105341>1/4 of your ancestors were actual turks>and that's from "turkic dna project"A Greek with 1 Turkic grandparent is still a Greek, this proves absolutely nothing.
>>18105405Anatolian Greeks are like 1% Greek and 99% Anatolian
>>18105355>>18105355This 100%, Turks always ignore the fact that they were largely West Eurasian father and Mongolic mother hapas when they entered central Asia let alone Anatolia
>>181054091. That's wrong2. The actual Anatolians were cousin peoples of the Greeks. It's like comparing Swedes and Northern Germans, if not closer3. Literal Greeks colonized and developed many parts of AnatoliaTime to get off Turknet
Turks are the mestizo goblino ruined race offspring of the Turkmen oghuz subhumans who deposited mongoloid genetics in the formerly caucasoid Anatolian lands Causing a notable degradation and decline in the racial standard of the land and creating notable deformities within the people in eye shape, beard growth potential, cheekbone and craniofacial structure, skin texture, hair texture, Hence why Turks are completely alien to the region. It’s as if Bantus crossed into Italy and destroyed civilization there completely and raped the remnant population into a mulatto quadroon deformed subhuman population and the subhumans still larped as Bantus and tried to genocide and be racist against the last remaining full Italians. And tried to go to Africa to dedicate their lives to pan Bantu nationalist causes in Africa too. It’s would be a complete racial civilizational travesty if that happened
>>18105411Trvth
>>18105409If the area they're from has been Greek since the Iron Age migrations more than 4 thousand years ago it is silly to call them anything else. And even the Cappadocian Greeks, the least Greek of them, have been Greeks for around 2000 years.
>>18105341
>>18105405It proves that greeks should be raped to turkification
