Communists have no right to complain about the CIA sabotaging them when communists' end goal is a violent overthrow of every capitalist nation and the execution of anyone and everyone deemed reactionary. Every single right-wing militia funded by the CIA was onlyfunded in response to communist militias funded by the USSR.You communists reap what you sowed. If the Soviets didn't want to be sabotaged, then they should have been completely isolationist with no support of any kind for communists outside their own borders.
Both commies and amerigolem capitalists are subhuman trash that should be exterminated. There isn't any ''moral'' side in this conflict
>>18105553The difference is that Communists did it for a good cause while crapitalists did it to line their own pockets
>>18105583Nope. Communism is slave morality, which is why it degenerates to tyranny.The proletariat does not know how to run a government. Whenever they overthrow a ruling elite, another ruling elite emerges right behind it (Bolsheviks, Maoists, etc.). The "dictator of the proletariat" is a farce. Absent checks and balances, he who rules is the most cunning, not the most virtuous. Communism is a veneer for Machiavellianism.The poor do have a legitimate grievance against the rich, but Communism is not the solution. Virtue is the correct measure of a ruler, not wealth.
>>18105553Ah, but that would be rational and consistent, as well as being incredibly inconvenient for their traditional mainstream narratives. They don’t want to be guided by logic
>Suddenly capitalists don't like free market forces
>>18105585>Nope. Communism is slave morality, which is why it degenerates to tyranny.How can overthrowing the people oppressing you be slave morality? Being a good little cuck and doing nothing on the off chance you become rich is slave morality af.>The proletariat does not know how to run a government. Whenever they overthrow a ruling elite, another ruling elite emerges right behind it (Bolsheviks, Maoists, etc.). The "dictator of the proletariat" is a farce. Absent checks and balances, he who rules is the most cunning, not the most virtuous. Communism is a veneer for Machiavellianism.False premise with nothing to back it.Try harder next time
>>18105614>How can overthrowing the people oppressing you be slave moralityThere is no such thing as “capitalist oppression”, to claim there is automatically makes you a schizoid cultist.>False premiseNope, even Plato understood that the masses are too stupid to know what is truly best for the country. Read his work “The Republic”, your ignorance is showing.
>>18105553>when communists' end goal is a violent overthrow of every capitalist nationThis argument only makes sense if communist parties are allowed to organize, and they're literally illegalized in the US and in many parts of the western world.
>>18105621.There is no such thing as "capitalist oppression"YOUR ignorance is showing
>>18105583the good cause being spiteful mutants terrorize normal people.
>>18105631You cannot reason with rightoid oyinbo boot licker cowards. They think sucking zionist jew cock is empowering.
>>18106412>right wing is when you're a zionist Go back to /leftypol/
>>18106425Not him, but thats true.
>>18105631Why don't they just, you know, stop mining?
>>18106425>right wing is when you're a zionist100MT TRVTH NVKV
>>18105585>The poor do have a legitimate grievance against the richEnvy is not a morality.
>>18105553100% truth nuke. Commies are always silent on the terrorists and insurgencies the Soviets funded to destabilize non-communist countries. A dictatorship that lets people trade with each other is better than a dictatorship that prevents people from trading with each other. Of course you back the guy who wants to hammer your enemies.
>>18106544>Commies are always silent on the terrorists and insurgencies the Soviets funded to destabilize non-communist countries.that's because communists hate white people
>>18106574You're thinking of liberals.
>>18106574Communists hate everyone, including themselves lmao. Loving communists would pool their money and buy some land for their commune, not try to drag the entire world civilization into their madness. The use of force is the explicit surrender of your moral high ground.
>>18106544Those were based though? Oh no, they tried to free workers in other countries from capitalism, the horror!
