Why didn't Upper or Lower Canada join the American Revolution?
>>18108245They weren’t traitorous scum.
>why didn't the papist frogs who just got c*thtard policies past in their favor by the King and Parliament not side with the papist-hating Pvritan Chads of New EnglandA real head scratcher, that one
>>18108272It's not like English speaking Canadians appreciated the Quebec Act>The Quebec Act of 1774 was a British law passed in response to rising tensions with the American colonies, intended to secure the loyalty of the French-Canadian population. It granted Roman Catholics religious freedom, allowed them to hold public office, restored French civil law and property rights, and extended Quebec's boundaries south into the Ohio Valley. However, the American colonists viewed it as one of the "Intolerable Acts" because it denied them access to westward expansion and was seen as an affront to their anti-Catholic and representative government ideals, directly contributing to the outbreak of the American Revolution
>>18108245Canadians didn't believe in slavery
>>18108277>and extended Quebec's boundaries south into the Ohio Valley.Georgie unironically deserved the Charles treatment for that one alone, but the pro-papist shit was truly the icing on the shit sandwich he served up to the colonies. Only a k*aut pretending to be an Englishman could make such a retarded blunder considering everything that went in England in the 17th century
>>18108245Idk about Upper Canada but Lower Canada would've definitively joined if Enlightenment ideas reached them early
>>18108272>policies past in their favorLetting brown people access the internet was a mistake.
>>18108511>brown people give a shit about the details of white people historyIt was a fucking typo you nigger
It was cold outside o algo
>>18108503>letting frogs keep their religion is pro-papsimThis is why no one takes the revolutionaries seriously.
>>18108624Uh anon.. The revolutionaries won.
>>18108655Oh well I guess Germanic barbarians were superior to Rome because they won in the end.
>>18108665Considering the useful countries of are Germanic stock while southern Europeans haven't done shit in the past 1000 years, yeah.
>Still less does the true patriot circulate opinions which he knows to be false. No man, who loves his country, fills the nation with clamorous complaints, that the protestant religion is in danger, because “popery is established in the extensive province of Quebec,” a falsehood so open and shameless, that it can need no confutation among those who know that of which it is almost impossible for the most unenlightened zealot to be ignorant:>That Quebec is on the other side of the Atlantick, at too great a distance to do much good or harm to the European world: >That the inhabitants, being French, were always papists, who are certainly more dangerous as enemies than as subjects: >That though the province be wide, the people are few, probably not so many as may be found in one of the larger English counties: >That persecution is not more virtuous in a protestant than a papist; and that, while we blame Lewis the fourteenth, for his dragoons and his galleys, we ought, when power comes into our hands, to use it with greater equity: >That when Canada, with its inhabitants, was yielded, the free enjoyment of their religion was stipulated; a condition, of which king William, who was no propagator of popery, gave an example nearer home, at the surrender of Limerick:>That in an age, where every mouth is open for liberty of conscience, it is equitable to show some regard to the conscience of a papist, who may be supposed, like other men, to think himself safest in his own religion; and that those, at least, who enjoy a toleration, ought not to deny it to our new subjects. >If liberty of conscience be a natural right, we have no power to withhold it; if it be an indulgence, it may be allowed to papists, while it is not denied to other sects.
>>18108655Not in Canada. Thus the thread
>>18108245>lower canada on the top>upper canada on the bottomsilly people
>>18108768?
>>18108245If you haven't noticed, French Canadians are the world's biggest welfare queens.
>>18108768Canada was settled by Australians
>>18108670Haha yeah, the renaissance didn't happen XD
>>18108503George III was actually quite beloved back home in Britain and was affectionately nicknamed Farmer George
>>18108684Samuel Johnson is probably the best pro-British rule/anti-Revolutionary voice of the Loyalist camp (I know he's technically not a "Loyalist" since he was never in America but you know what I fucking mean)
>>18108245>Upper CanadaFor the most part empty frontier back then, no real Anglophone population to speak of >Lower CanadaTheir grievances simply weren't the same as the Anglophone colonists' grievances, and they had largely secured their goals with the Quebec Act and saw no further need to agitate or risk their newly won privileges and legal protections.
>>18108624>implying it wasn't You're historically illiterate if you think it wasn't. Do you even know what the Seven Years War was about? >>18108880>back homeWhere everyone was an illiterate retard whose rights as Englishmen he never stepped on, yes. What's your point?
>>18108768>Go downstream a river, call the place lower>Go upstream a river, call the place lowerJust like the Lower and Upper Kingdoms of Kemetic Egypt
>>18108768pleb>>18109372patrician
>>18108819Only surpassed by angloid canadians.
>>18109418>picrelVGH... /his/ used to be so kino
>>181093147th gen mutt nigger detected 90% of englishmen at the time didn’t have voting rights retard
>>18109694>he thinks voting rights were the only rights 18th century Englishmen had>while screeching about "muh 7th gen mutt nigger"Is it /int/nigger hour already?
>>18108684>>That Quebec is on the other side of the Atlantick, at too great a distance to do much good or harm to the European world:>Fuck you colonists, you're on the other side of the Atlantic so it doesn't matter if you're ruled by papists or notwhat a dick-head.
>>18109314>Do you even know what the Seven Years War was about?Of course I do. The Quebec settlement was no more pro-papist than William allowing the Irish to keep Catholicism. This is just another Revolutionary exaggeration which they were so fond of making.
>>18109928>the Irishlol, lmao evenWho the fuck gives a shit about those tribalist micks, we're talking about the c*thtard frog hordes that just tried to claim the Ohio Valley for themselves and then here comes King Retard to give it all to them. That's not "Revolutionary exaggeration", it's the entire basis for Dinwiddie starting the Seven Years War by psyops'ing an impressionable young lieutenant colonel into trekking through the wilderness to broker a deal with a foreign enemy whose language he didn't even speak. You're being purposely avoidant and you know it
>>18108503>>18109314The Ohio valley was given to the Natives, not the French. The peace of 1763 also set up the Church of England in Quebec.
>>18109977See >>18108277You don't even know what the fuck we're talking about you retard
>>18108514>brown people give a shit about the details of white people historyI mean, looking at how /pol/ and socnat twitter is full of Mexicans and Asians, I'd say yes, they do.
>>18109987Wikipedia isn’t a source. lol is this the best you can do?
>>18109987The Seven Years War ended in 1763. The Quebec act was passed in 1774. You’re the one who doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
>>18110150>(you) bring up the Treaty of '63>umm sweaty, we're talking about '74 >UH.. UH.. WIKIPEDIA ISN'T A SOURCEYou know you can just not reply, right?
>>18110156Are you so retarded that you don't know how (you)'s work? The Seven Years War ending in '63 does not negate the fact that in '74 George passed the most retarded Act of his reign and it kicked off THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, the thing OP explicitly was asking about. Goddamn this board is retarded.
>>18110169Retard, you're the one who brought up the seven years war >>18109314>Do you even know what the Seven Years War was about?You clearly don't know what you're talking about because you mixed up the Quebec Act of 74 with the Treaty that ended the Seven Years War. You can't even keep up with your own posts. I knew the American education system was bad, but I didn't realize it was this bad.
>>18109314George III never stepped on anyone's rights. Your 200 year old propaganda doesn't work anymore. >>18109769The colonists were never in any danger of being ruled by Papists.
>>18110203>The colonists were never in any danger of being ruled by Papists.True, but the point i'm making is that the argument he made was extremely callous and facetious. Acting like it doesn't matter what happens in the colonies since Protestantism is still around in Europe is of little assurance to the colonists.
>>18110200>you mixed up the Quebec Act of 74 with the Treaty that ended the Seven Years WarThose were two completely separate posts you illiterate retard. I brought up the Seven Years War in relation to the frogs being c*thtards. The '74 Act was in relation to the Ohio Valley. >american educationClearly they don't teach basic reading comprehension where you're from>>18110203I explicitly said he DIDN'T you illiterate /int/nigger>>18110276>Acting like it doesn't matter what happens in the colonies since Protestantism is still around in Europe is of little assurance to the colonists.Especially when the King start fucking around with giving them rights and then in '74 rights to the Ohio Valley. Johnson is the epitome of the clueless Brit who had no idea what was going on in the colonies.
>>18110419>Those were two completely separate posts you illiterate retard.You're only reinforcing that you can't keep up. You brought up the Seven Years War in response to someone bringing up the French being allowed to keep their religion. Just admit you were wrong, buddy. It's already evident everyone else here.
>>18109987>>18110169>>18110419SYBAU literal retard
>>18109769They literally weren't ruled by Papists though, Quebec (Canada) was a separate colony from the others
>>18110462>>18110496Seethe harder
>>18110504see >>18110276
>>18110504>nnnnooooo just stop complaining about the papists on your front step you fucking colonial niggers This is what you're arguing for by defending j*hnson
>>18108655And humanity lost.
>>18110647Yes, and it’s a good argument. The papists posed zero threat to the colonists.
>>18110985>it's a good argument to just wave away the fact that England itself has been fighting wars against the papists for literally decades and those stupid, backwoods, scum of the streets colonists have nothing to be bitching about Are you actually retarded or what? The colonists had every fucking right to fear papist FRENCHMEN right on their border. They just got done fighting them in '63 you fucking retard. Johnson's telling them to ignore the last century plus of wars that England has been fighting against papists on the continents and you're just like "hurrrr he's so right durrrr" And I'm saying this NOT as a e-christlarper, but because I'm amazed by just two fucking retarded you are
God, I remember the days when picrel was one of the main /ourguy/'s on this board. Now I bet the average user couldn't even name him without using AI shit to reverse search the image This board has fallen below /×/
>>18111237Yeah this board is actually straight up garbage nowadays. Literally just shitty /int/ without the flags
>>18111242The /int/nigger infestation has truly reached critical mass
>>18108272Wife and daughter, cuck dad, bull, and the kippah wearing yid in the back. Yup definitely a protestant home
>>18111182They had nothing to bitch about because they just defeated the papists, made them all British subjects, and chased the French out of North America. There was zero threat to them remaining. Johnson was right and you're coping. The uppity American plantation owners were just using any excuses they could to rebel.
>>18108503>fight the Seven Years War in support of Virginia's claim to the area>win>assign it to Quebecwhat did he mean by this?
>>18111821They were both his domains as far as he could tell, you have to remember that it was the 1700s and the colonies were literally a 2 month transoceanic trip away, the Americas were basically fucking Mars for this dude and European politicians had zero direct experience on the frontier or direct interaction with their assorted colonial subjects.
>>18108245Bc the english went far and above to appease the local French speaking poeole. The only reason people from Arcadia got deported was bc they refused to swear fealty to the english monarchy. But the French speaking canadians did. They didn't care so long as they can stay catholics, didn't have to pay extra taxes and could have local control over their own politics.
>>18108277Yup. Glad aome people here know what they are talking about.
>>18108245Name one war Quebec was eager to fight. They're the smartest Frenchmen in the world. You can't surrender in humiliation if you never fight
>>18111482>projecting your cuck fetish this hard Seek a mental health professional >>18111569>They had nothing to bitch aboutThey had everything to bitch about. You admit that they *won* the war against them and yet here goes George giving them more rights AS PAPISTS than any papist has ever had in England and while simultaneously jacking up the restrictive policies hurting the non-papist colonists to the south. The colonists who are, and for a century plus have been, born and raised Englishmen. Do you seriously not see the contradiction here? >hurrr Johnson is right and you're coping durrrrrrYou have yet to present any kind of counter-argument as to why the colonists should have been okay with the King throwing the just-defeated (as you admit they were) enemy better terms than the colonists themselves received. The colonists won the war in N. America for England and what did they get in return for it? More restrictions on their trades, the Ohio Valley denied to them, and their taxes being raised. The French papists unironically got a better deal as enemies than the men who fought to win England all of North America.>plantation owners>in New England and the Middle Colonies>plantationsI see you're even more of a retarded /int/nigger than I previously thought possible>>18111821>fight the Seven Years War in support ofYou're thinking of George II and Pitt. George III didn't gain the throne until 1760. But he meant to show how absolutely retarded he was. Like his good friend Jefferson, he was a "le Enlightenment man" when it came to science and shit but absolutely horrendous as a political leader.
