If she was such a great Queen why did James I have such a huge witch problem when he took over for her? Was Elizabeth just neglectful or was she secretly pro-witch?
>>18108296She was raped as a child so I wonder if she was physically unable to bear children herself.
>>18108303nah try royal inbreeding. both her and Mary were said to have deformed pussies.
>>18108296>>18108303>>18108309She had sex with John Dee. Theor offspring is none other than Francis Bacon, who was jailed by James btw.
>>18108325>Theor offspringsaaarrrrr
>>18108303She was said to have been tortured by her guardian as a child, British upper class tradition.>>18108325But Bacon was Shakespeare. Who wrote well into James' reign. Did Elizabeth sequester herself or wear giant dresses for six months?
It was reported that Elizabeth had a "membrane" of some kind down there and a French surgeon was recruited to remove it, however she could not overcome her fear of sex.
>>18108296Women are notoriously soft on sin. It is easy to play on their sympathies to avoid dealing out the death penalty.>>18108338>But Bacon was Shakespeare.Cringe take. It was a collection of authors, with many of the most prominent works being written by de Vere.
>>18108352Well i am sure at least Bacon started it. If De Vere wrote Hamlet and Macbeth then that explains why the composition is so different and inferior.
>>18108296witches are not real, that's just primitive superstition
>>18108374Exactly what a witch would post.
>>18108364What makes you so sure Bacon started it
>>18108389Bacon surely represents the largest and most or all of the early plays.
James had a deranged obsession with witchcraft while king of Scotland and wrote a notorious book about witches and their practices, but as king of England he mostly abandoned that shit.
>>18108374>witches aren't realYou shouldn't need to tell someone this on a history board.This is the type of bullshit you get when you mix the history board with the religion board. I can't for the life of me understand why they don't give the Christfags their own board.They're always shitting up our history threads with their notion that the world is 6000 years old and dinosaurs didn't really exist.A Christfag is the opposite of a history buff. They cannot understand science, history, or well, anything really if their brains are degraded lusting after that faggot crucified jew in a loincloth.
>>18108410So he joined the witches? Sad.
>>18108364What a strangely niche troll. >>18108405>Q: What makes you so sure Bacon started it?>A: Bacon started it.
>>18108338except the author know to history as "Shakespeare" was acktchually Edward De Vere the XVII Earl of Oxford and "alleged" pedo serial killer. Very Hollywood, indeed.
>>18108405No, he wasn't, and don't call me Shirley. Again, "Will" was Edward de Vere. /thread
>>18108296"Christ had his John, and I have my George." -King James, I (a literal faggot)
>>18108723>>18108433Have fun burning.
>>18108715>>18108338>Édouard de Vere wrote England's only meaningful literratureAnglos really have no culture lmfao
>>18108410The Scots had a pathological obsession with witches for some reason, they were one of the most notorious countries for that and the last person put to death for witchcraft there was as late as 1722.
>>18108296She was a witch. Just as her father sold his soul to Satan in exchange for a chance to nationalize religious organizations across England she sold her fertility to Satan in order to try to undo the efforts of the one Tudor monarch who wasn't trying to unleash pure evil on the world. Just imagine meeting something that looked like pic related and assuming that it was a human being.
>>18109276You're not getting your armada back, Pedro.
>>18108754The """English""" have been voluntarily wearing the "Ol' Norman Yoke" for centuries, but that's an entirely separate issue. Reality and the facts prove the de Vere was "Will", and it's been a rather open secret for quite some time now, as has the "Authorship Question", in general. Now, I know it's hard to imagine England being run by a bunch of elitist, pedophiles, but it was as true then as it is today. Good people can write bad literature. Bad people can write good literature.
