[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: npr.brightspotcdn.gif (110 KB, 880x507)
110 KB
110 KB GIF
So, without conveniently relying on the argument of slavery (which isn't all that important when you think about it in modern terms concerning almost equivalent capitalism and its social ills), and casting this aside, who was actually right about this conflict overall? In other words, I propose to you a challenge: you must argue who was right about their cause without using the easy excuse of slavery.

Slavery was already guaranteed by the laws and Lincoln himself spared slaver border states who sided with him.. it is fair to say there were other issues at stake.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.