[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1761571500095197.jpg (7 KB, 269x188)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
You cant Simply explain how 1000 spaniards with a few slow reloading muskets managed to conquer 30+millions of chicanos even with the
>But muh coff
>>
More like
>1,000 Spaniards + 5 m natives vs 5 m natives
Rinse and repeat
>900 Spaniards vs the remining 15,000 natives

It's eaiser to topple a larger force when you take advantage of existing conflict and pit contemporaries against each other.
>>
File: 183737747444.jpg (129 KB, 1080x678)
129 KB
129 KB JPG
>>18113162
it's even worse when 1000 moors conquered and raped iberia for almost a millenium without diseases carrying them
>>
>>18113262
You keep posting this like a retard yet you still fail to explain all of us why ALL of Europe has """northafrican""" in different degrees including Scandinavians.

Could you care to explain it to us?
>>
I don't understand how the the tribes that allied with the spaniards were so naive to think that after the war was over they wouldn't be ruled by the spaniards.

You see hundreds of dudes with weapons that look like magic to you, armor you have never seen, horses, cannons, giant ships... and you think yeah let's help them defeat our enemy tribe and then they will share power with us...

How naive do you have to be to think like that?

The logical thing to do would have been that all the tribes unified against a common, more powerful and completely foreign enemy.
>>
>>18113356
The tribes that allied with the Spanish benefited from the Spanish conquest and did better than how they were doing under the Aztec Empire.
>>
>>18113383
For a how long? And then they lost all power and their culture was completely changed.
>>
>>18113356
Txacalans wanted to kill Spaniards and fought 3 battles agains them before deciding to join.

So Spaniards had to defeat 3 times the Txacalans and then the Aztecas which made it much more impressive.
>>
>>18113356
>I don't understand how the the tribes that allied with the spaniards were so naive to think that after the war was over they wouldn't be ruled by the spaniards.
It's the same that happened to the Visigoths that allied themselves with the moors, the parallels between the two are extremely similar
>>
racial superiority and divine intervention
>>
>>18113449
No, there is a big big difference. The difference of military power between the natives in america and the spanish was much much bigger than between the visigoths and the muslims.
>>
>>18113260
The smallpox crap is fake
>>
File: Coahuila.jpg (80 KB, 542x305)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>compares the aztecs with the latinx-american mutt subculture "chicanos"
>>
File: smallpox.jpg (18 KB, 262x192)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
>>18115145
It isn't, Cuitlahuac, the emperor who defeated the spaniards at the "noche triste" died from smallpox
>>
>>18115249
So obviously not smallpox.
>>
>>18115252
Give me your arguments then.
>>
>>18115261
It's obviously not smallpox. You lose.
>>
>>18113162
Mesoamericans are not as violent or martially formidable as sometimes portrayed in pop culture.
>>
>>18113162
haha OP I love froggo XD



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.