He sounded based. RIP King.
>>18118309Imagine his face when he realized his most ancient ancestors believed on the Most High God and are in Heaven without him.
>>18118317They didn't have circumcision so it's probably not the same Most High God.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grove_of_Fetters
>>18118342the most high god didnt always do circumcision. nor was it ever a requirement to get into heaven
>>18118309How I imagine baptists feel.
>>18118346The Jew God told his first Jew that circumcision was going to be an everlasting covenant though. He also said no uncircumcised man could enter his sanctuary.
>>18118309F
>>18118374The the requirement of circumcision is completely gone in Christianity as we’re “all circumcised in Christ.” Christians never circumcised themselves and it only made a comeback in Anglo countries in the 1800s to stop masturbation. That didn’t work so people coped by saying it had to do with cleanliness and oh hey, ancient Jews did it. Modern circumcision is a secular phenomenon sometimes coopted by dispensationalists Protestants that want to larp like Jews.
>>18120091>The the requirement of circumcision is completely gone in Christianity as we’re “all circumcised in Christ.”Paulinism isn't true christianity
>>18120101>Just ignore 13 books of the New Testament that the vast majority of Christians believe and base large parts of their religion on.Oh okay. Then I’ll leave you to sperg about a group that most Christians don’t belong to and had nothing to do with OP’s pic.
>>18120120>Just ignore 13 books of the New Testament that the vast majority of Christians believe and base large parts of their religion on.Yes, that's exactly how it is. Pauline christianity is the heresy of the already heretical early christianity. Sorry to break it down to ya, but as far as Yahweh is concerned about your gentile ass, you're going to hell.
>>18120140My point still stands that your association of “Pauline” Christianity (basically making up all of Christianity as we know it) with circumcision is wrong. You’re just trying to distract from that.
>>18120144Paul was the one who abolished circumsicion among christians.
>>18120091Jesus didn't say anything about circumcision being over.
>>18120150Jesus is explicit in saying that the he has fulfilled the law and that it is by faith in him that you’re saved because everyone falls short of the glory of God (don’t sweat every little rule but be distant from God like the Pharisees; repent and pursue a relationship with God first and foremost). To many Christians, the Covenant of Works was replaced by the Covenant of Grace. Paul also explicitly says in the Bible that circumcision is not required. That’s why no Christians are circumcised outside of Anglo countries and South Korea, which was heavily influenced by the US.
>>18120178>Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.He didn't abolish circumcision, or the sabbath, or anything pertaining the law, that was all Paul as the other anon said.
>>18120178>Jesus is explicit in saying that the he has fulfilled the law Dude, Jesus himself was circumsized, and not once he spoke ill about that practise.
>>18120150Paul did, and you can't have Christianity without Paul, who is a Prophet of sorts.
>>18120178He was referring to the accusation that he was a false prophet and came to replace Yahweh's law with his, like a heretic, not that he was abolishing anything, the reverse being true
>>18120201Paul hijacked Christianity yes.
>>18120147>>18120201Paul was rather ambiguous about it.
>>18120221Circumcision causes brain damage to infants, that's why all these Jews were mentally ill.
>>18118309I love those wing helmets.
>>18120101>seethes about Saul of Tarsusshalom moshi
>>18120197>but to fulfill themreading comprehension is not your strongest suitjust sayin'maybe stay away from Christian Theology until you learn more
>>18120263Read>>18120199>>18120213
>>18120199>>18120300>reading comprehension But did He speak about the practice at all?
>>18120303Following common sense, if he didn't say nothing about it, then he accepted it. Paul's problem if he didn't get the memo
It always ad hominem the moment you have them by the balls, I swear
>>18120263>le reading comprehension coping retard
>>18120322>literally 0 arguments you're only here to be a nuisance shoo joo
>>18120313>following common senseis that the best (you) can do?lmao sorry the mohel sucked your peepee
>>18120318who are you talking to buddy?looks like you just threw a random comment there just cause
>>18120263>literally 0 arguments
>>18120339>>18120342See? Ad Hominem
>>18120339do we know who sucked rabbi yeshua's though?
>>18118309This guy was more of a man than anyone in this thread, and that's all that really matters. By default his opinion carries more weight than all y'all's. Cope.
>>18120381I do wish to be half the man he was
>>18120318The ole 'you're jewish' or 'jeet'
>>18120199>Jesus himself was circumsizedDid a rabbi suck Jesus' bloody little dick?
>>18120359>kvetching intensifies ok moshithis topic is not for (you)
>>18120853>this topic is not for (you)you mean goys?
>>18120101real christianity, like communism, has never been tried
>>18118317You mean Tyr?
Honestly though, this may be a more specific Friesian/North Hollandese characteristic
>>18118309He never said that
>>18121552He did.
>>18121556You think a pagan confessed a belief in Christian cosmology? When he had his own cosmology? You really do have to be a certain level of stupid to be a cuckstain.
>>18118309Radbod, son of Aldgisl, son of Beroaldus, son of Richoldus II, son of Odibaldus, son of Richoldus I, son of the god Freyr
The harrowing of Hades happened, so it's likely that his ancestors and frens are in Heaven.
>>18121794>The harrowing of Hades happenedProof?
>>18121557I was there
>>18120101Watch out Anon, you're gonna make a lotta people angry with this one…
>>18118309Based
>>18121794>so it's likely that his ancestors and frens are in Heaven.but why?
>>18118346Nice retcon, brah
>>18123805Me too. He didn't say it.
>>18121552>>18121557the legend goes he wanted to join the franks willingly but at his baptism he asked whether his ancestors would be in heaven, then changed his mind when told not, no mention of hell. this is the first time im seeing this, looks like some meme to appeal to normies about "partying in hell" or some bullshit.
>>18124854Where would they be though?
>>18125134Hell. That guy is being obtuse.
>>18118374Paul speaks against circumcision and living by Moses law in Galatians I believe
