How come the 'tea' analogy of consent has held up so strong after decades? No one who disagrees has been able to make a proper response to ithttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQbei5JGiT8
Rarely does "no" mean never. Usually "no" means "suck on my titties for 10 more minutes then ask again."
>>18118924Isn't there someone you forgot to ask?
>>18118924What if half the population pretended to hate tea, but it was common knowledge they liked to be pinned to the floor and have tea poured down their throat while they pretended to protest?
>>18118924drinking tea doesn't usually cause an increase in birth rates unless you're insinuating I throw roofies into it. then I accept your concession.
>>18118924This is not a universally accepted notion of consent. This is something called "affirmative consent", which has been legislated into law in some places>It is the responsibility of each person involved in the sexual activity to ensure that he or she has the affirmative consent of the other or others to engage in the sexual activity. Lack of protest or resistance does not mean consent, nor does silence mean consent. Affirmative consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual activity and can be revoked at any time. The existence of a dating relationship between the persons involved, or the fact of past sexual relations between them, should never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of consent.Sexual intercourse involved numerous steps of escalation from beginning to end. It is absurd to require a man to seek "affirmative consent" at every single step morally and legally. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f--u_puzhGs
>>18118924Beyond the fact that a person who made it has never been in a relationship with woman, if a person would refuse tea as they're drinking it sure they've drank some tea ok their own, and there's tea they didn't want inside of them, but they just put the teacup away and that's it.If it's an analogy for sex and a woman decides to change her mind as she's being pumped, will she be able to effectively stop the intercourse and clearly declare the refusal of concept to her partner(preferably by filling a multi-page form and signing every page of it)? Is she doesn't do that then this would imply that she's not physically capable of putting the teacup down, and would have to drink it whole, therefore by the standard previously set by the analogy the person who made her tea was gambling every time he or she did so and in that particular case despite the best intentions they became liable of unconsensual tea making. Now I don't believe you can go to jail for that, or face any consequences in fact, but for rape you definitely can.
>>18118964How you can be a good citizen and point out jeets on your board
>>18118924You know what I'm not sure this is history or the humanities.
>>18118999philosophy
>>18118924It cheapens complex human intimacy into a consumer transaction "offer, accept, consume" and ignores moral duties of marital relationships. This is why it's impossible to "rape" your spouse - the marriage covenant/contract is lifetime implied sexual consent. >>18118932Also this, kek. If all men always stopped at the first no, then nobody would ever be born again.
>>18118964good morning saar
>>18119089Consent-based morality is indeed a landmark of 2nd-wave feminism.
>>18118924what is this "tea" thing?>kek
>>18118924>Hijab
>>18119414chud
>>18118924And if they say yes and drink the tea that's consent so children can consent
