God doesn't live up to His own moral standard, therefore Christianity is internally inconsistent and God doesn't exist.God orders the stoning of people for things like astrology. People (and animals) were stoned for walking near Mt. Saini. A long drawn out painful death. God punishes David by slowly killing his baby over a period of a week.God demanded they build a theocracy, then punished them later for having said theocracy. God pushes morals onto people that he himself can't even live up to, and can't justify. You can't justify the slow beating to death of people with rocks and claim to be the moral objective of the universe.If God is real, the slow killing of a live baby to get revenge on someone is something he's okay with. And that's immoral. In God's eyes, it can be moral (if there's a good enough reason according to whatever) to kill people with rocks and torture babies?
>>18119270>this violates modern human rights accords and the geneva convention so it's obviously immoral and inconsistentYou merely substituted your worship.
>>18119270Jews just accept that God is kind of an asshole and "works in mysterious ways" and what little we know about him requires an autistic level of Pilpul from individuals to come to their own conclusionsThere's an old joke about a Jew being stranded on a deserted island, after 6 months people finally track him down and find him and see that he's built 2 Synagogues, they ask the Jew why he built two of them, and this is his answer>"This is the Synagogue I go to, and this is the Synagogue I don't go to!"
>>18119272You literally cannot justify the slow murder of an innocent baby. "Because God wants to (also he's perfect in every way and is all that is good)" doesn't really hold up.
>>18119282Yes I can - because God wants to. The whole purpose of faith and what differentiates it from mere utilitarianism is "because God said so".
>>18119270>Thou shall not kill>Kills everyone except Noah>Thou shall not steal>Taxes you 10%>Thou shall not covet >Covet another god's worshippers
>>18119270Enjoy Hell.
>>18119270>>18119351That which is wrong under one circumstance may be, and often is, right under another. God said, “Thou shalt not kill.” At another time He said, “Thou shalt utterly destroy.” This is the principle on which the government of heaven is conducted: by revelation adapted to the circumstances in which the children of the kingdom are placed. Whatever God requires is right, no matter what it is, although we may not see the reason thereof till long after the events transpire.
I'm staying far away from divine command tards in case their imaginary friend "orders" them to harm someone.
>>18119402>That which is wrong under one circumstance may be, and often is, right under another.That's quite literally moral relativism btw.
>>18119270that's the Demiurge, don't get mindfucked by him
>>18119270Ontology changes morality, God can do things humans can't, pretty simple
>>18119919See >>18119830.
>>18119270>Humans are subject to the same standard as the literal Creator of the universeIt's gonn a be a no for me.
>>18119830Not exactly. The fact you give a relative statement doesn't make it relativism, else most mechanics would be part of relativism due to speed being a relative metric. Relativism, local or global, usually goes a lot further than merely acknowledging relativity to a concrete frame. It argues that frames are all relative themselves.
>>18119925You don't know what moral relativism means
