>>18119577
Because it was written by ancient Jews who were presumably mad about getting gaped by Assyrians. The entire OT is an exilic or postexilic seethe book. It's hilarious.

The disposition of mankind's sin is the biggest single theme in the bible. Do you remember the part where a person shows up in the story and fundamentally changes the relationship between God and the sinner (all of us)?
Or are you just a lonely bored fat kid? If you are, it's OK.

>>18119577
haha OP I love froggo XD

>>18119577
The first two humans weren't Adam and Steve

>>18119577
Romans 1:32

>>18119577
I desperately want a boyfriend but I've painted myself into a corner with le "ENJOY HELL xDD" posting both on this site and IRL. Oops!

>>18119577
Because they have buttsex with men. What the fuck??? Shit they do even worse than that but I'll spare you.
No logical reason to not simply have buttsex with women. It's proven by this rejection of the female anus that homosexuals are insane/evil.

>>18121101
>Because they have buttsex with men. What the fuck??? Shit they do even worse than that but I'll spare you.
No logical reason to not simply have buttsex with women. It's proven by this rejection of the female anus that homosexuals are insane/evil.
What does that have to do with the Bible?

>>18121101
>No logical reason to not simply have buttsex with women.
1. Women don't have penises.
2. Women don't smell sexy. (Blech)
3. Women don't have testosterone, which means little muscle and energy during sex. Having sex with a woman is like having sex with a weird smelling sack that just lays there. Do yourself a favor and try men. You won't regret it.

>>18121111
I would imagine this inherent bizarre insanity was/is rationalized as a good reason to at least segregate them from society. And in the Bronze Age this was accomplished by violent force.
Note the wording in the Bible btw
>If a man ALSO lie with mankind, AS he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
which is sort of a tacit admission that the only normative aspect of heterosexual sex is that the man is the active and the woman is the passive. and the "hole" doesn't matter. the New Testament also condemns lesbians, who don't literally engage in intercourse.

>>18121116
which is to say, if homos love buttsex so much why don't they have it with women?
>>18121113
sort of proves that they're just obstinate against the female sex that God is supposed to have made for them

>>18121124
>sort of proves that they're just obstinate against the female sex that God is supposed to have made for them
How is it my fault that I have a hard time getting hard for women and have an easy time getting hard for men?

>>18121127
It seems unlikely that a gorillion years of heterosexual reproduction shaped by natural selection would make you want to mate with a dead end.
>inb4 buttsex with women is a dead end
true. but no one who is heterosexual exclusively has anal sex, and the instinct to breed is such that the obviously better hole, the vagina, will win out in the end. it's like saying since heterosexual couples engage in oral sex that they're "doing it wrong"... when in reality, the "rightness" of the pairing comes from the fact it's male and female.

>>18121085
>>18121113
>>18121127
Repent or burn.
>How is it my fault
It is your fault that you indulge perverse affections

File: Allah knows it best.jpg (297 KB, 1717x800)

297 KB JPG

>>18119577
Become a Muslim and you can zutt the Akhis. Ib4 butt.butt it's haram in Islam. No it's not.

>>18121136
You're wrong but in the end it doesn't matter since I have to stay in the closet. I'll end up marrying some woman (*sigh*) and maybe having fag sex on the side when I can get away with it.

>>18121144
You'll end up burning in hell.

>>18121147
That's not going to happen.

>>18121149
>But the foolish children of men miserably delude themselves in their own schemes, and in confidence in their own strength and wisdom; they trust to nothing but a shadow. The greater part of those who heretofore have lived under the same means of grace, and are now dead, are undoubtedly gone to hell; and it was not because they were not as wise as those who are now alive; it was not because they did not lay out matters as well for themselves to secure their own escape. If we could come to speak with them, and inquire of them, one by one, whether they expected, when alive, and when they used to hear about hell, ever to be the subjects of that misery, we, doubtless, should hear one and another reply, “No, I never intended to come here: I had arranged matters otherwise in my mind; I thought I should contrive well for myself; I thought my scheme good. I intended to take effectual care; but it came upon me unexpectedly; I did not look for it at that time, and in that manner; it came as a thief. Death outwitted me: God’s wrath was too quick for me. O my cursed foolishness! I was flattering myself, and pleasing myself with vain dreams of what I would do hereafter; and when I was saying peace and safety, then sudden destruction can upon me.”

>>18121158
That's not the Bible.

>>18121166
It's based (on the bible).

>>18121169
Have fun burning.

>>18121171
No u
>Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor [e]effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.

demiurge hates some of his children more than others

I mean homosexuality is pretty disgusting especially going by pre-modern hygiene stands imagine all the poop they got on their dicks

>>18119577
Remember, 99% of the bible is written by genuinely seething Jews, squatting in a goatskin tent in a desert wasteland, hopping up and down and tearing out fistfuls of hair in wild fury whenever it sees someone do something it doesn't like, then dashing back to the tent to write down how the sky wizard is going to punish them for it and then they'll see, OH THEY'LL SEE!

>>18121626
Tick tock.

>>18119577
>“The bible commands that you have to execute homosexuals.”
>Why?

Homosexual men despise women. Atavic hatred, I mean.

Whether due to some unquantifiable trauma done by a wicked woman or wicked man, or something that made them enjoy men & dislike women; homosexual men hate women.
It's like discussing antipodes.

Homosexual men are embedded to the “Shall I dominate you or shall you dominate me?”, which is inherently dictatorial, totalitarian. This spirals into what we'd describe as Nazism or Bolshevism; into selective “purity” tests & the hierarchy of who is towering over whom.
Militarism, policing, is hardcoded hierarchism. They get off of that.


Opening the front door to homosexuality, you will simultaneously, always, and inevitably open the backdoor to nazis, communists... Like a recipe, one leads to the other. You'll never not find homosexuals that aren't into domination-dominated dynamisms.

All structural powers (political, social, religious...) that emphasize domination-dominated are inherently totalitarian, hierarchical.
Homosexuality is a primary recipe to that.
All men are created equal.
All women are created equal.

Beware of men and women that want to upend that; least you want virtuous men destroyed by homosexual men & wicked women, and virtuous women lose faith in humanity because of homosexual women & wicked men.

>>18121136
You don't think having a bunch of tribe members who are just as big and strong as other men and can hunt and protect just as well, but aren't competing and getting into conflict over mating, would be an advantage?

>>18121710
How am I wrong?

>>18121136
There’s a pretty simple evolutionary reason for homosexuality. Gays don’t have children as often but they do have families. If your brother has two kids that’s the evolutionary equivalent of you having one kid. So when you consider humans are complex social animals? It makes sense to have a minority of them that have a biological drive to help and support their relatives and no competing motive from their own offspring.
>>18121144
Why do you need to stay in the closet? You’re just going to make a woman unhappy and ensure you yourself will be miserable. Unless you can find a lesbian to marry. Then you two can cover for one another.

>>18121830
>groomers "care" for children
Yeah, in a way. That's how they propagate their degenerate behavior since they cannot reproduce if they are acting on their desire for the same sex.

>>18121884
I assume you also believe that all heterosexual men want to molest prepubescent girls then? Since otherwise the statement is nonsensical.

>>18121892
No? Some do, but most men aren't groomers. Many if not most homosexuals are. Whether subconsciously or not, they want to spread their orientation. Btw NAMBLA was part of the LGB(T...) movement before they got kicked out only for optics reasons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILGA_consultative_status_controversy

>>18121147
Better than being surrounded by christcucks for eternity.

>>18121901
You liked a controversy from the 1990s about branding, not an indication that homosexuals want to have sex with prepubescents. Pedophilia is a specific pathology. Homosexuality is a natural occurrence unrelated to the pathology of child molestation. Though I suppose we should do more to ensure that ‘heterosexual’ men, especially Christians aren’t molesting children. Because I sure see a lot of ‘straight’ men going after kids in the news.

>>18119577
Because antibiotics hadnt been invented and poopsex spreads disease same reason muslims are scared of bacon, filthy could kill you in those times

>>18119577
Jews seethe about male homosexuality because it was powerful and destroyed them several times over.

>>18122882
Prior to modernity homosexual intercourse was mostly orals, frotting, handjob and kissing, stuff stafer than vaginal sex even...

>>18119577
They are gay

>>18121830
>Why do you need to stay in the closet?
Because I can't live with my parents or church finding out I love cock.
>You’re just going to make a woman unhappy and ensure you yourself will be miserable.
That doesn't follow at all.
>Unless you can find a lesbian to marry. Then you two can cover for one another.
WHAT'S YO STUD NAME?

>>18121101
In Romans 1:26-27 Paul is likely talking about anal sex being the sinful part, whether it's between men or a man and a woman.
He never says women started having sex with other women, just that they replaced natural sexual relationships with unnatural ones, but he does say men started having sex with men.
Although I could be wrong, something tells me that Paul wouldn't even have considered lesbian sex to be sex since the OT doesn't list it among sexual sins. This is not to say that he would have aproved of it lesbianism, but I don't think he would aprove of anal sex either.>>18121085

>>18119577
Welp, thanks for the tip. I got work to do.