[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_20251028_205014.jpg (148 KB, 720x1001)
148 KB
148 KB JPG
Why historically it was common for female of perceived "inferior" cultures to marry males of perceived "superior" cultures, while the other way around was much rarer?
Are females just more flexible in changing their culture, their faith, their tribe?
>>
>>18120268
Send them back to their designated streets. No escape from their fate. They must evolved and improve themselves or suffer through what they can for themselves create.
>>
>>18120268
>shitting on her own religion
So she is doing hindusim right



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.