[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Alright, so let's say, for whatever reason, the Virginia Colony maintains systems of long indenturehood rather than evolving to slaveholding, which only happened due to the ruling of one judge, how would this kind of manorial sharecropping system be effected by the Revolution? Slavery was able to survive it, but would 1700s indentured sharecropping be able to?
Note: not all the indentures would be white, as in fact, historically not all were either. While the majority were British/Irish, there was a sizeable contigent of African indentures too (this is where the original slave population of the U.S South was sourced from).



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.