King James Version vs Douay-Rheims
>images of Christ everywhereSecond commandment violation
>>18120882The King James is better, the DR funnily enough is better than most modern versions. Also, you'll often find that they can't print the DR without endless commentary to make sure the reader knows that the Bible doesn't actually mean what it says.
Is it true there are Douay-Rheims onlyists among some English-speaking Traditional Catholics?
>>18120908Dude, the DR isn't even based on the original languages, as the pic says, it is a translation of the Latin Vulgate
>>18120882What is the question?Personal preference? Literary value? Historical importance? Accuracy to source material?
>>18120908>the DR funnily enoughnot really that funny or unexpected.The DR is based on the Vulgate which ultimately is based on, or shares its lineage with, the majority text. The KJV is based on the Textus Receptus which is based on the majority text.nuBibles just remove entire verses due to three(3) manuscripts alleged to be "older" over the thousands of manuscripts making up the majority. They also liberally change the readings of words which we've understood for thousands of years.
>>18120900The image isn't graven it's painted.
>>18121001Imagine trying to lawyer your way around God's rules
>>18120920Modern DRs are actually Challoner's revision, which was significantly influenced by the AV.
>>18121005He was very clear...
>>18120920>Dude, the DR isn't even based on the original languages, as the pic says, it is a translation of the Latin Vulgate1. This isn't a gotcha. I know that.2. My point still stands. 3. You're retarded.>>18120912Yes. They hate the King James and will be dispatched to the burn pit, forever.
>>18120882All gods are mythologyAll holy books are fiction
>>18120882Why does the DR have a different Genesis 3:15 than every other version?
>>18120912
>>18120882>based Anglo prose that deeply impacted global literature>seething Romecuck scribblesHmmmm
