Really makes you think that only 20% of the Anatolian cities in the Byzantine Empire had Greek names.Rest had Hittite names.Really shows you who was the native and who was the invader.
don't look at a map of the US
>>18121066Nobody pretends that white people are native to the US.But people think that the Greeks are native to Anatolia.Bizarre
Hellenization- took 1000 years to complete, Greeks integrated Anatolians but kept race and regional sub cultures the same built upon civilization. Turkification - burned down civilization, replaced it with nomadism, raped population to be 20-50% central Asian subhuman mestizo synthetic race, turkification happened rapidly in 100 years, completely reset everything, now Anatolia is a degraded area
>>18121080Turks have higher math scores than Greeks
>>18121069>But people think that the Greeks are native to Anatolia.Literally who
>>18121092Lmao. Wrong upload? Nigger
>>18121121Check Cyprus.
>>18121069technically if you go back far enough anatolia is european clay
>>18121059Greek names that are stated as Hittite or other:KymePhokaiaAigaiMagnesiaDorylaionPossibly KadoiAigiroessaDidymaKnidoasand im sure there are others here.
>>18121059Couple things. First a question: >Why is Luwian now being conflated with Hittite?And:>Magnesia, Gordieon, Priapos, Abydos, Gordos and more all come from Europe.
The Greeks were a small elite group wherever Alexander had conquered. The Byzantine Empire was multiethnic but had a common idea if nationhood that transcended these ethnic lines. Slav, Jew, whoever.
>>18121691...Turk
>>18121059Turkroach, you're a fucking ignorant idiot. Cities like Mycenae and Tiryns from the Homeric age don't have Greek names, they have pre yamnaya migration names. Does that make Mycenaeans, who spoke Greek, wrote Greek, any less Greek? In fact there should be no cities with Greek names because Anatolia is ancient, but the fact there are and it stretches back to even the bronze age is you defeating your own point. If you had more than 80 IQ maybe you'd know these things but you don't because you're a stupid Greco armerinian mix who was buck broken by asiatic Muslims to believe you actually have an identity and wuz chinky steppe hunters.
>>18121059Places in England have Brittonic names.
>>18121092Not surprising. Idolatrous Greeks are simply unable to compete with the superior Muslim mind.
>>18121092Modern "greeks" are the exact same mongrelized anatolian mystery meat as the modern turks, but whom Westeners imposed greek on them as part of their Classical Greece dickriding. Same exact race.
>>18122154Okay but why did Scotland have so many Greek names?
>>18121069"Native" is a meaningless term.Anatolians (Luwians, Hittites, etc.) aren't "native", they're Indo-Europeans from the Steppes.What is a native? Define the term.
>>18122212What? Qrd?
>>18122400In older texts there's a plethora of Greek named islands but also sanctuaries even during the early medieval period, for example they show up in Bede and Nennius from the 1st millennium. There's the island of Iona, Eubonia, and there is still the Hebrides in Scotland today. If you look up the etymologies they just outright deny it, and you'll see weird explanations for why the Hebrides is named that despite -ides being very clearly a Greek suffic and Heb- meaning youthful, or a youth in Greek so it means "of the youth". I'm not conspiratorial, but it's bizarre that popular sources won't just admit that obviously Greek names are Greek.
>>18122416Werent they named so during the times of Roman colonization?
>>18122419No, and the reason is because the Antonine, Hadrian, and Severan walls are all outside and below those locations. The Romans never colonized the Picts or northern Scots/Irish completely and they never conquered the Irish or their islands where Iona is, so all of the locations I listed were outside of Rome's control. Even if Rome did control it, it still wouldn't make sense for there to be so many Greek names and not Romans. That's why I didn't include Greek men in the study, because they could just be recent transplants but if they were naming geographical features in Greek then it takes on a whole different shape. On the contrary, where the Romans conquered mostly retained Gaelic names, aside from adding cester from castrum. Even London might come from the name Lud, which is not Latin, so what we're seeing is very strange.
Anyways, I have a list of some 50 locations in the northern Atlantic down to central Europe that are Greek derived. I'm sleepy right now or I would start a thread
>>18122435>>18122430Yeah but these places having Greek names 'recently' doesnt mean that they always didIt can be case of some forgotten colonies by Greeks? But that seems extremely unlikely. As far as I am aware there wasnt continental travel going up that far and boats back then werent really any better for such a long trip.
>>18122465Pytheas was up there in the 4th century BC. The alternative is that Dorics were there before the Bronze Age Collapse. The original three names I listed are all attested in the 1st millennium AD, not very recent at all. Given the conservative nature of urban etymologies it doesn't make sense to bet in favor of spurious naming schemes. The short version is that it's evidence proving that Greek ancestors were in northern Europe. And before you spout your hatred for northern Europeans, I don't care to hear it.
>>18122523Excellent hypothesis. Any sort of genetic data backing it up?
>>18122555Myriads. You're not using admixtures, are you? That's a sin around these parts.
>>18122095own that bitch, king
>>18122523>Europe is America's colonyI mean it ended up being true eventually, but this isnt really a convincing argument
Anatolians were indo-europeans, anon. They even used the Greek alphabet many of themI'm sorry you're a Turk mutt trying to regain a sense of identity
Yeah, they're different like Norwegians and Swedes
>>18121059We have threads like these that you can predict it's always bait by the usual suspects >>18122212>>18121059
