It's over. They absolutely mog everyone. Almost 50% steppe. Not a single Nordoid above 40%. They're the closest on Fst too.
>>18121387This confirms the Aryans were brown. Nordcuck phenotype is from GAC.
>>18121387Aren't the Welsh and the Cornish literally beating them here?
>>18121392Zucoid? I'll educate you.>This confirms the Aryans were brown. Which Aryans are we talking about? Those from the west or the east? If we are referring to those from the east, Andronovo, Sintashta, and even some samples as recent as 1000 BC, are not only plotted among the northern Europeans, but also share similar physical characteristics with them. >Nordcuck phenotype is from GAC.I know that chasing jaguars every day might prevent you from reading the most recent literature, but today it's known that it wasn't people X or Y that brought characteristics A or B; we know that this was selected over time until homogenization occurred. Furthermore, the available GAC samples aren't really much more "Nordic" than the contemporary steppe populations of CWC.>>18121387A terrible and inflated model. Making the G25 political was a mistake. But what do the studies really say? Let's see>Additionally, our recent date of admixture fits with the arrival of the South Asian ancestry at the same that the shift from east to west-Iranian language in Tajiks linked to the Persian expansion 1500 years ago>note here that the steppe group who admixed with BMAC did not present East Asian ancestry, which is consistent with both the archeological and genetic findings of the East Asian ancestry arriving in the Central steppe core only at the end of the Iron Age.In summary, there was a mixture of South Asian and East Asian ancestry, absent in the Indo-European peoples of Central Asia and even less so among the Nordic peoples https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8760286/But now... who really possesses the greatest number of steppes today in terms of autosomal ancestry? It certainly isn't "Tajiks" with ancestry from three distinct components.
>>18121532>>18121387Ah, how I know the genius here surpasses expectations; the study of the photo isn't the same one I linked, by the way. But anyway, studies are unanimous that in fact, northern Europeans and those from the British Isles are actually the ones with the greatest steppe ancestry, a less rubbish model than yours in Gcope25.Thread BTFO'd.. i must say.
>>18121541>>18121532That wasn't even necessary, you wasted your time answering these la creatura threads made by la creatura tajijs on average more steppe than jatts, an average of 35% or less actually these g25 models are garbage, use qpAdm, bitches.
>>18121532Perfectly valid model because BMAC is not just Iran_N. You could say that Steppe itself is part BMAC, so it makes it hard to distinguish the two components.
>>18121545No, I just woke upAnyway, I understand the limitations of the G25, which is itself a PCA... I bet someone will soon post a distance table on the G25 of some Yamnaya_RUS_Samara sample and how it's supposedly closer to the pamiris, (in terms of "distance") note, but it's also easily explained by the G25's deficiency in distinguishing certain substantial components.
>>18121549Okay... then have this Fst chart instead. They're the closest to them. Cope.
>>18121546>Perfectly valid No, shitty model, Europeans have a higher steppe, and the so-called "Tajiks" (which you're too stupid to see encompasses various ethnicities) have other components that would naturally prevent them from having a higher steppe. See again>>18121532>You could say that Steppe itself is part BMACCHG is not synonymous with "iran_N", you illiterate.Sarazm_En is not BMAC. But anyway, it seems you're missing something important. Remember also that Kotias and Satsurblia are separated by thousands of years, and yet they always cluster very close to each other, but never overlap with the ancient inhabitants of Belt/Hotu/Zagros. There is no iran_N, bmac in steppe, again, garbage model from an ignorant person who embarrassed themselves in less than 10 minutes. steppe_EBA It's a more complex mix
>I bet someone will soon post a distance table on the G25 of some Yamnaya_RUS_Samara sample and how it's supposedly closer to the pamiris, (in terms of "distance"Lol Didn't I say that some illiterate person would say this sooner or later?
So yes, OP refuted.And to finish the tapir massacre, remember that both the CHG or "iran_N" and populations like the first Iranian farmers were extinct around 5000 BC.From the Late Neolithic they were replaced by closely related groups, but with much higher levels 30% of Anatolian ancestry, such as the Darkveti-Meshoko and the Seh Gabi ChL.The ancestry related to CHG (which is not synonymous with iran_N) in the Eneolithic of the Steppes is definitely closer to CHG than to Ganj Dareh or anything similar, and even then, it's not exactly CHG. This is not surprising, at least if you're not a retard, which is not the case for the OP... considering that CHG originated in the southern Caucasus, while the Eneolithic of the Steppes is from the northern Caucasus, and the Caucasus has always been a significant barrier to gene flow in Western Eurasia, and obviously, NO RELATION to the Iranian plateau. I closed the thread. And with my departure, may defeat befall you, I finished here. Its over
>>18121560>CHG is not synonymous with "iran_N", you illiterate.And why does BMAC pick up both Kotias and Sidelkino? It's almost like it's already part steppe.
>>18121584With Gonur_2 which is more divergent they're still the highest anyway.
>>18121392Yanaya are Aryans. Nords are most Aryan
>>18121387On a related note, does picrel prove the fir bolg (and related groups) were real?
