>Early Medieval Mongols: North European-Siberian Hapas >Late Medieval Mongols: Just rice farmer chinks with micropenisHow did it happen? Did Mongols import millions of chinks?
Why is Hitler always right. Even the Mongols had "Aryan" blood.
>>18121800>>Early Medieval Mongols: North European-Siberian Hapaswe wuz khangz
>>18121800Well modern Mongols are mostly chinks (Yellow admixture) while Siberian Turks are just Nordic-Siberian Hapas.
>>18121815>Overall, Mongol period individuals characterized by a remarkable decrease in Western Eurasian ancestry compared to the preceding 1,600 years. They are best modeled as a mixture of ANA-like and East Asian-like ancestry sources, with only minor Western genetic ancestry.
>“Rather than a simple genetic turnover or replacement, the rise of the Xiongnu is linked to the sudden mixture of distinct populations that had been genetically separated for millennia. As a result, the Xiongnu of Mongolia show a spectacular level of genetic diversity that reflects much of Eurasia,” says Dr. Choongwon Jeong, lead author of the study and a professor of Biological Sciences at Seoul National University.https://www.shh.mpg.de/1901683/genetic-history-of-mongolia>A recent large-scale paleoproteomic study has confirmed milk consumption in Mongolia prior to 2500 BCE by individuals affiliated with>the Afanasievo (ca. 3000 BCE) and Chemurchek (2750–1900 BCE) cultures (Wilkin et al., 2020a). Although Afanasievo groups in>the Upper Yenisei region have been genetically linked to the Yamnaya culture of the Pontic-Caspian steppe (ca. 3300–2200 BCE)> and a western Eurasian mitochondrial haplogroup (Rogers et al., 2020).https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420313210
>>18121800>>18122157First off, this study is mostly about Turkic populations, not Mongols. Second, the native Mongol ancestry is ANA and they're still majority that, except some Mongols in China itself. What happened is that they were leading a coalition of Scytho-Siberian mutts that went on to become modern Turkics. The Xiognu elite was almost exclusively ANA in ancestry/y-dna: >According to Lee & Kuang, the main paternal lineages of 62 Xiongnu Elite remains in the Egiin Gol valley belonged to the paternal haplogroups N1c1, Q-M242, and C-M217. One sample from Duurlig Nars belonged to R1a1 and another to C-M217. Xiongnu remains from Barkol belonged exclusively to haplogroup Q. They argue that the haplogroups C2, Q and N likely formed the major paternal haplogroups of the Xiongnu tribes, while R1a was the most common paternal haplogroup (44.5%) among neighbouring nomads from the Altai mountain, who were probably incorporated into the Xiongnu confederation and may be associated with the Jie people>The study concluded that Xiongnu confederation was genetically heterogeneous, and Xiongnu individuals belonging to two distinct groups, one being of primarily East Asian origin (associated with the earlier Slab-grave culture) and the other presenting considerable admixture levels with West Eurasian (possibly from Central Saka) sources. The evidence suggested that the Huns probably emerged through minor male-driven geneflow into the Saka through westward migrations of the Xiongnu
>>18121800>Early Medieval Mongols: North European-Siberian Hapas It is obvious that these people were Xiongnu/early Turkics and not Mongols
>>18121815>Well modern Mongols are mostly chinks (Yellow admixture) well, clearly not, mongola=/=mongol
>>18122208>Polka scienceG25 is trash.Mongols got CHINKED>Overall, Mongol period individuals characterized by a remarkable decrease in Western Eurasian ancestry compared to the preceding 1,600 years. They are best modeled as a mixture of ANA-like and East Asian-like ancestry sources, with only minor Western genetic ancestry.
>>18121800it says they are turkic in the early medieval one you retard
>>18122554You mean I don't get to spam BWC memes? How rude
Why did the goalposts move? Why did whites suddenly become HAPAs in this thread? And HAPAs became Hans? Odd!
