>>18124440
Fucking based. I am going to spend this entire period protesting the papist festival of Satan ("Hallowtide") by remembering Reformation Day and Guy Fawkes Night.

>>18124460
>swapping one papist for another
Fawkes fought for Spain when they tried to suppress the Netherlands you fucking retard

>>18124429
>>18124460
Fawkes was a Catholic

>>18124508
Do you not understand that Guy Fawkes Night is anti-Fawkes, right?

File: IMG_4257.jpg (648 KB, 1770x2820)

648 KB JPG

>>18124548

What do you mean the Hollywood movie lied to me?

>>18124429
we do not forget, we do not forgive

File: everytimeispeak.png (1.07 MB, 1387x1135)

1.07 MB PNG

>>18124429
we r anomolous
we abide within a region
we do not drink
we do not do drugs
expecto patronum

On another note, I think we should send 10 of Allah's bravest into parliament with a length of rope apiece.
The decline of the west and it's consequences has been a disaster for my liver and mental health.

>>18124475
But Spain was the good guy

>>18124622
>loses to swamp krauts
>loses their entire empire to some Brits larping as pirates
Mmm, sweaty I don't think so

>>18124633
That has nothing to do with what I said

Noone really does it here in London, up North it's the best holiday of the year. Maybe because of my pyro tendencies, but goddamn the scale of bonfires and fireworks up especially around the peak district is wild.

>>18124638
All you said was some weak bait. Don't expect a seriously reply.

OP watched the slop and thought Fawkes was Protestant kek

>>18124713
>OP watched the slop and thought Fawkes was Protestant kek
Guy Fawkes night is about celebrating the capture and execution of Fawkes you moron

>>18124548
>>18124734
That's because you're retarded.

Guy Fawkes did nothing wrong.
Sane people celebrate his heroic attempt to blow those Scotch beggars back to their native mountains.

Yes, Guy Fawkes was a hero and true patriot.
Though generations of mouthbreathing droolers burn him in effigy thinking they are damning his memory, in truth they have immortalized him and his cause.

>>18124815
>Yes, Guy Fawkes was a hero and true patriot.
he was a papist sell out who fought for the Spaniards, the same ones who had tried to invade England less than 20 years before. No Englishman who recognizes the authority of a foreigner, IE the Pope, can call themselves a real patriot.

>>18124815
Puritanschizo thinks guy fawkes night is about celebrating him instead of celebrating his capture and execution
Schizophrenic retard

>>18124825
Magna Carta guarantees the liberties and property of the church of England from the power of the king.

At the time of it's writing, the church of England submitted to the authority of Rome.
If you don't uphold Magna Carta, I don't understand the sense in which you can claim to be English.
And those perfidious criminals Cranmer and Cromwell certainly assented to and facilitated the flagrant and repeated violations of Magna Carta.

>>18124861
>puritanschizo talking more shit
You've been blown the fuck out mate sit down and shut up for once you papist LARPer
You aren't even english yet you're obessed with us

>>18124815
Guy Fawkes was literally a Catholic terrorist who staged a failed terrorist plot on parliament. He was a dirty Papist scumbag, absolute Romish rubbish!

>>18124877
The state of your country is that of a worldwide laughing stock.
Absolutely nobody takes you seriously, your own government hates English culture, considers affirmations of nativity to be hate speech, and arrests people for flying their flag, etc.

Get your shit together.
If you are English, it's a goddamned shame that you feel as if you have the right to puff yourself up while you meekly lick the boots of your statist masters and their new favorites.
Yes, you condemn Fawkes. You probably celebrate the coup and Dutch usurpation of 1688 as well. Because the servile and sniveling withered shell of your national pride demands it.
Yes you will burn your greatest champion in effigy, make some noise and qq about muh papist boogeyman, then go home and pay your TV licence.

>>18124882
The only thing Fawkes did wrong was failing to get the job done. And much of that wasn't even his fault.

>>18124815
Counterpoint:

>Gay Fawkes

>>18124932
You're literally a schizophrenic retard who thinks there is a protestant internet defence force dedicated to defending john wycliffe on /his/
King Billy was based, the founding fathers celebrated the glorious revolution (they weren't monarcucks like you pretend they are)
You are an american catholic who will continue to worship muh based pope who washes the feet of blacks and will do nothing about being replaced by spics (but they're BASED catholics so it's ok in your eyes)

>>18124938
Catholics aren't your enemy.
They are not responsible for the current state of your nation.
Simple as.

Your obsession with this paper cutout object and effigy of 2 minutes hate is emblematic of your own inability to deal with the IRL problems you are afflicted with today.

It's cathartic, you put all these negative feelings on the image and burn it up.
But he's really your champion, he's taking these things off your shoulders and giving you a chance to be merry.
He burns brightly, giving you light to see with through the very symbolism of a whole burnt offering.

You can vainly crow about "papists" all you like, as if you lived 200 years ago, but it's pointless and a convenient way for you to forget what is really happening and how it's your government to blame.
If it's easier for you the morning after you burn Fawkes to put up with their shit, know you missed the point entirely.

>>18124972
Catholics are the problem. Tory Crypto-Jacobites in the 1770s ruined britain and warred against our american brothers.
And You're a literal american schizophrenic raging against a british tradition.
Keep kneeling to nonwhites though. While white brits riot against multilculturalism you do nothing while jamal rampages through your neighbourhood and hernendez ethnically replaces you with his spic spawn. You're not even an actual american you're an ellis islander latinx mutt schizo who rages about john of gaunt and has fantasies about murdering people. really fucking strange.

>>18124985
>our american brothers
how precious
that sure does fly in the face of other things you've said ITT

>not even an actual american you're an ellis islander latinx mutt schizo
You don't know a thing about me.
My father's father's were patriots, militiamen and revolutionaries.
You could never measure up to their example; you are a disarmed subject people in the thrall of Orange man.

How could I look at the example of Fawkes trying to remove the Scotch Presbyterian scourge from his native English soil and see him as anything other than a nativist.

How could I read the Magna Carta honestly, and not see those who resisted the illegal actions of Henry VIII and his successors as true to the principles and law of their land?

>>18125063
>how precious
>that sure does fly in the face of other things you've said ITT
My actual anglo american brothers not latinx papists like you
>You don't know a thing about me.
>My father's father's were patriots, militiamen and revolutionaries.
No they weren't. they were farmers in chiapas
>You could never measure up to their example; you are a disarmed subject people in the thrall of Orange man.
Pretending your fathers were american revolutionaries yet complaining about the glorious revolution is quite funny because the american revolutionaries were inspired by the glorious revolution and because america had revolted against stuart rule in the 1670s and 80s. Americans traditionally hated the stuarts even more than the british did.
>How could I look at the example of Fawkes trying to remove the Scotch Presbyterian scourge from his native English soil and see him as anything other than a nativist.
LARPs as english anti scot Yet you cry when scotch papist jacobites are rightly purged. Funny that
>How could I read the Magna Carta honestly, and not see those who resisted the illegal actions of Henry VIII and his successors as true to the principles and law of their land?
A tory papist pretending to care about the magna carta. LMAO. Henry VIII's actions were completely legal. The "catholic" rulers of the past had dissolved foreign monasteries in england. previously. Edward III did it.

>At about the same time, Scotsman Allan Maclean successfully lobbied King George III for permission to recruit Loyalist Scots throughout North America. In April, he received royal permission to raise a regiment known as the Royal Highland Emigrants by recruiting retired Scottish soldiers living in North America.[7] One battalion was to be recruited in the northern provinces, including New York, Quebec and Nova Scotia, while a second battalion was to be raised in North Carolina and other southern provinces, where a large number of these soldiers had been given land. After receiving his commissions from General Thomas Gage in June, Maclean sent Donald MacLeod and Donald MacDonald, two veterans of the June 17 Battle of Bunker Hill, south to lead the recruitment drive there. These recruiters were also aware that Allan MacDonald, husband of the famous Jacobite heroine Flora MacDonald was already actively recruiting in North Carolina.[8] Their arrival at New Bern was cause for suspicion by members of North Carolina's Committee of Safety, but they were not arrested.[9]
>In the pre-dawn mist, a company of Loyalist Gaels approached the bridge. In response to a Patriot call for identification shouted from across the creek, Captain Alexander Mclean identified himself as a friend of the King. He responded with his own challenge in Scottish Gaelic. Hearing no reply, he ordered his company to open fire, beginning an exchange of gunfire with the Patriot sentries. Lieutenant-Colonel MacLeod and Captain John Campbell then led a hand-picked company of swordsmen on a charge across the bridge.[16]
>When the Loyalists were within 30 paces of the earthworks, the Patriot militia opened fire, to devastating effect. MacLeod and Campbell both went down in a hail of gunfire; 20 musket balls had struck MacLeod.[16] Armed only with swords and faced with the overwhelming firepower of Patriot muskets and artillery, the Highland Scots retreated.
Puritanschizo will cope and not respond to this.LMAO

>The Protestant Revolution, also known Coode's Rebellion after one of its leaders, John Coode, took place in the summer of 1689 in the English Province of Maryland when Protestants, by then a substantial majority in the colony, revolted against the proprietary government led by the Catholic Charles Calvert, 3rd Baron Baltimore.

>The rebellion followed the "Glorious Revolution" in England of 1688, which saw the Protestant monarchs William III and Mary II replace the English Catholic monarch King James II. The Lords Baltimore lost control of their proprietary colony, and for the next 25 years, Maryland would be ruled directly by the Crown.

>The Protestant Revolution also saw the effective end of Maryland's early experiments with religious toleration, as Catholicism was outlawed and Catholics forbidden from holding public office. Religious toleration would not be restored in Maryland until after the American Revolution.
American patriot Militiamen hated the stuarts, loved the glorious revolution, it was in their blood

>>18125074
>No they weren't.
>Pretending your fathers were american revolutionaries
It's simply true.
This fact, that an unbroken line from father to son from a father and son that served together with their extended family in defense of their new nation persists to this day, rustles your jimmies.

Ticonderoga and Saratoga aren't just an area of academic interest to me, those places are where my father's father's tread down the mercenaries of that so-called p*rl**m*nt.
And later too, in the war of 1812, for what it's worth. Militia service in Maine isn't nearly so renowned, but it did happen.

I have an actual connection to this history you could never dream of.
You're probably a bastard with no knowledge of his family history past 1950.

>Americans traditionally hated the stuarts even more than the british did.
And yet you seem puzzled that one could celebrate Guy Fawkes' attempt to destroy the Stewart dynasty.

I don't hate the Stewart's really.
I have a lot of respect for Charles II, for example.

File: 1760582529887.jpg (1.1 MB, 1674x1582)

1.1 MB JPG

>>18125114
You're literally a spic latinx papist LARPing as an anglo
>You're probably a bastard with no knowledge of his family history past 1950.
I can trace my family line to the 1300s in Northumberland
You, as a latinx conquistador rapebaby cannot
>And yet you seem puzzled that one could celebrate Guy Fawkes' attempt to destroy the Stewart dynasty.
He also attempted to destroy parliament. Anybody familar with history would know that. Spastic
>I have a lot of respect for Charles II, for example.
The cuck who lost against the dutch and ended privateering against spanish papists. LOL

>>18125082
>Religious toleration would not be restored in Maryland until after the American Revolution.

That's right.
In fact, the Jesuits remained active in the US even after the suppression of their order in western Europe.

>>18125126
Repeating your slander that I am a Mexican doesn't make it true.

>can trace my family line to the 1300s in Northumberland
They were papists.
But really though you're a bastard and your father was cuckolded by a Welshman.

>also attempted to destroy parliament
And that's a good thing, too.

>ended privateering against spanish papists
What?
He literally cooperated with the French to do just that.
The pirate city of Nassau owed it's golden age to his patronage and this collaboration with the French. It was after this policy ceased that the decline for them began in earnest.
Ever hear of Henry Morgan? But of course you haven't.

>>18125163
>Repeating your slander that I am a Mexican doesn't make it true.
No person of english descent celebrates the norman conquest and the harrying of the north, or makes weird schizophrenic theories about england's national poet being a secret propaganda tool of john of gaunt
>They were papists.
And the ancestors of every catholic was a pagan yet catholics seethe about based pagans constantly
>And that's a good thing, too.
Because you hate liberty
>What?
>He literally cooperated with the French to do just that.
No you fucking retard, Cromwell pioneered buccaneering and piracy with his western plan. Charles continued the policy for a while but began banning piracy in the 1670s
>The pirate city of Nassau owed it's golden age to his patronage and this collaboration with the French. It was after this policy ceased that the decline for them began in earnest.
Holy fuck you are retarded. Nassau was not a city, it was a shanty town, and it only began to be used in the 1710s, over 30 years after Charles the Second's death. Port Royal was a buccaneering stronghold after cromwell's troops conquered jamaica from the spanish
>Ever hear of Henry Morgan? But of course you haven't.
I know far more about Morgan than you do. That he served in cromwell's western plan against the spanish for one thing. Which you will deny about it or just stay silent because you're a catholic who seethes about cromwell.

It's funny that as soon as I mentioned the fact that americans universally loved King William, hated the stuarts and jacobitism and the founding fathers saw themselves as the inheritors of the values of the glorious revolution puritanschizo just glossed it over and pretended he never mentioned it to cope for the fact that he got blown the fuck out. Strange that.

>>18124429
Guy Fawkes was a retard. He chose to blow up Parliament on Guy Fawkes night-of course they're going to be looking for him then

be me, an unapologetic son of the American revolution with a pedigree that is literally considered to be a document of historical note and listed as such on the internet search engine
>NO YOURE A SPIC LATINX PAPIST BROWNOID
>I AM LE WHITE
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
tfw :/

Why are /his/ protties so absolutely unhinged and spiteful?
Sometimes I think it's just cognitive dissonance from being schismatic apostates from the apostolic tradition and church Christ founded.

>>18125200
It's not a secret that Gaunt sponsored both Chaucer and Wycliffe.
But you can't talk about Fawkes without bringing up irrelevant treads to angrily attempt to discredit me.
There's no point in letting your red herring derail the thread.

Fawkes was a hero.
Everything he did was based and redpilled.

>you hate liberty
You don't even have freedom of speech or to bear arms. You get years in prison for facebook posts while your magistrates give organized criminal foreigners a slap on the wrist for rape.

You have entire mobs of foreigners walking around with machetes looking for someone in possession of British flag and your police do nothing at all.

You have never known liberty.

>>18125252
>be me, an unapologetic son of the American revolution with a pedigree that is literally considered to be a document of historical note and listed as such on the internet search engine

What religion were your ancestors who served in the revolution?

You must be a special kind of retard to argue that James I of England was Presbyterian

Based burn a cathcuck day

>>18125392
>>18125379
Don't even bother with him, he is unironically schizophrenic and thinks people who call him out on his bullshit are paid protestant shills paid by John of Gaunt

>>18124815
>and his cause.
The average modern person doesn't even know why Guy Fawkes wanted to blow up the parliament lmao, they just see him as a vague "symbol of rebellion" and primarily associate him with a comic book and a 2010s internet larper movement, not radical catholicism

E-protestants are becoming just as cringe as trad caths.

356. However, these conspirators had provocation: ... The King, before he came to the throne, had promised to mitigate the penal laws, which, as we have seen, made their lives a burden. Instead of this, those laws were rendered even more severe than they had been in the former reign. Every species of insult as well as injury which the Catholics had had to endure under the persecutions of the Established Church was now heightened by that leaven of Presbyterian malignity and ferocity, which England had now imported from the North, which had then poured forth upon this devoted country endless hordes of the most greedy and rapacious and insolent wretches that God had ever permitted to infest and scourge the earth ... how the houses of conscientious Catholic gentlemen were rifled, how they were rummaged, in what constant dread these unhappy men lived, how they were robbed of their estates as a punishment for recusancy and other things called crimes; we have seen, that, by the fines, imposed on these accounts, the ancient gentry of England, whose families had, for ages, inhabited the same mansions and had been venerated and beloved for their hospitality and charity; we have seen how all these were gradually sinking into absolute beggary in consequence of these exorbitant extortions; but, what was their lot now! The fines, as had been the practice, had been suffered to fall in arrear, in order to make the fined party more completely at the mercy of the Crown; and JAMES, whose prodigality left him not the means of gratifying the greediness of his Scotch minions out of his own exchequer, delivered over the English Catholic gentry to these rapacious minions, who, thus clad with royal authority, fell, with all their well-known hardness of heart ... They entered their mansions, ransacked their closets, drawers and beds, seized their rent-rolls, in numerous instances drove their wives and children from their doors, and, with all their native upstart insolence ...

357. Human nature gave the lie to all preachings of longer passive obedience, and, at last, one of these oppressed and insulted English gentlemen, ROBERT CATESBY, of Northamptonshire, resolved on making an attempt to deliver himself and his suffering brethren from this almost infernal scourge. But, how was he to obtain the means? From abroad, such was the state of things; no aid could possibly be hoped for. Internal insurrection was, as long as the makers and executors of the barbarous laws remained, equally hopeless. Hence he came to the conclusion, that to destroy the whole of them afforded the only hope of deliverance; and to effect this there appeared to him no other way than that of blowing up the parliament-house when, on the first day of the session, all should be assembled together. He soon obtained associates; but, in the whole, they amounted to only about thirteen; and all, except three or four, in rather obscure situations in life, amongst whom was GUY FAWKES, a Yorkshireman who had served as an officer in the Flemish wars.

...

He it was, who undertook to set fire to the magazine, consisting of two hogsheads and thirty-two barrels of gunpowder; he it was, who, if not otherwise to be accomplished, had resolved to blow himself up along with the persecutors of his brethren; he it was, who, on the 5th of November, 1605, a few hours only before the Parliament was to meet, was seized in the vault, with two matches in his pocket and a dark lantern by his side, ready to effect his tremendous purpose; he it was, who, when brought before the King and Council, replied to all their questions with defiance; he it was, who, when asked by a Scotch Lord of the Council, why he had collected so many barrels of gunpowder, answered, "To blow you Scotch beggars back to your native mountains," and, in this answer, proclaimed to the world the true immediate cause of this memorable conspiracy; an answer, which, in common justice, ought to be put into the mouth of those effigies of him, which crafty knaves induce foolish boys still to burn on the 5th of November.

JAMES (whose silly conceit made him an author) was just, in one respect, at any rate. In his works, he called FAWKES, "the English SCÆVOLA"; and history tells us that that famous Roman, having missed his mark in endeavouring to kill a tyrant, who had doomed his country to slavery, thrust his offending hand into a hot fire, and let it burn, while he looked defiance at the tyrant.

Uh-Oh! Puritanschizo has been blown the fuck out and is now resorting to his usual tactic, spamming Cobett's polemic because has no other argument

359. This would be enough. of the famous gunpowder plot; but, since it has been ascribed to bloody-mindedness, as the natural fruit of the Catholic religion; since, in our COMMON PRAYER-BOOK, we are taught, in addressing God, to call all Catholics indiscriminately, "our cruel and blood-thirsty enemies," let us see a little what Protestants have attempted, and done, in this blowing-up way. This King James, as he himself averred, was nearly being assassinated by his Scotch Protestant subjects, Earl GOWRY and his associates; and, after that, narrowly escaped being blown up, with all his attendants, by the furious Protestant burghers of Perth. See COLLIER's Church History, vol. ii. p. 663, and 664. Then again the Protestants, in the Netherlands, formed a plot to blow up their governor, the Prince of Parma, with all the nobility and magistrates of those countries, when assembled in the city of Antwerp. But the Protestants did not always fail in their plots, nor were those who engaged in them obscure individuals. Fur, as we have seen in paragraph 310 , this very King James's father, the King of Scotland, was, in 1567, blown up by gunpowder and thereby killed. This was doing the thing effectually. Here was no warning given to anybody; and all the attendants and servants, of whatever religion and of both sexes, except such as escaped by mere accident, were remorselessly murdered along with their master. And who was this done by? By "blood-thirsty Catholics?" No; but by the lovers of the "Avangel," as the wretches called themselves; the followers of that KNOX, to whom a monument has just been erected, or is now erecting at Glasgow.

...

The conspirators, on this occasion, were not thirteen obscure men, and those, too, who had received provocation enough to make men mad; but a body of noblemen and gentlemen, who really had received no provocation at all from MARY STUART, to destroy whom was more the object than it was to destroy her husband. Let us take the account of these conspirators in the words of WITAKER; and, let the reader recollect, that WITAKER, who published his book in 1790, was a parson of the Church of England, Rector of Ruhan-Lanyhorne in Cornwall, and that he was amongst those clergymen who were most strenuously opposed to the rites and ceremonies and tenets of the Catholic Church: but he was a truly honest man, a most zealous lover of truth and hater of injustice. Hear this staunch Church-Parson, then, upon the subject of this Protestant Gunpowder-Plot, concerning which he had made the fullest inquiry and collected together the clearest evidence. He (Vindication, of Mary, Queen of Scots, vol. iii. p. 235,) says, in speaking of the Plot, "The guilt of this wretched woman, ELIZABETH, and the guilt of that wretched man, CECIL, appear too evident, at last, upon the far of the whole. Indeed, as far as we can judge of the matter, the whole disposition of the murderous drama was this. The whole was originally planned and devised betwixt Elizabeth, Cecil, Morton and Murray; and the execution committed to Lethington, Bothwell, and Balfour; and Elizabeth, we may be certain, was to defend the original and more iniquitous part of the conspirators, Morton and Murray, in charging their own murder upon the innocent Mary." Did hell itself, did the devil, who was, as LUTHER himself says, so long the companion and so often the bed-fellow of this first "Reformer," ever devise wickedness equal to this Protestant plot?

...

Let us hear no more, then, about the blood-thirstiness of the Catholic religion; and, if we must still have our 5th of November, let the "moral" disciples of KNOX, the inhabitants of "Modern Athens," have their tenth of February. Let them, too, (for it was Protestants that did the deed) have their 30th of January, the anniversary of the killing of the son of this same King James. Nobody knew better than James himself the history of his father's and his mother's end. He knew that they had both been murdered by Protestants, and that, too, with circumstances of atrocity quite unequalled in the annals of human infamy; and there fore he himself was not for vigorous measures against the Catholics in general, on account of the plot; but love of plunder in his minions prevailed over him; and now began to blaze, with fresh fury, that Protestant Reformation spirit, which, at last, gave him a murdered son and successor, as it had already given him a murdered father and mother.

360. CHARLES I., who came to the throne on the death of his father, in 1625, with no more sense and with a stronger tincture of haughtiness and tyranny than his father, seemed to wish. to go back, in church matters, towards the Catholic rites and ceremonies, while his parliaments and people were every day becoming more and more puritanical. Divers were the grounds of quarrel between them, but the great ground was that of religion. The Catholics were suffering all the while, and especially those in Ireland, who were plundered and murdered by whole districts, and especially under WENTWORTH, who committed more injustice than ever had before been committed even in that unhappy country. But all this was not enough to satisfy the Puritans; and LAUD, the Primate of the Established Church, having done a great many things to exalt that church in point of power and dignity, the purer Protestants called for "another Reformation," and what they called "a thorough godly Reformation."

>>18125484
What argument do I need to prove that Fawkes was a hero?

It's obvious to anyone with a lick of sanity that his course of action was not only justified and right, but also deeply bound up in his duty as an Englishman.

You are mad.

>>18125514
It's obvious to anyone with a lick of sanity that you're an unironic schizophrenic.
You have chosen not to respond to the people who disproved your retarded ideas (like the claim that charles the second founded the pirate base at nassau 30 years after charle's death) so you've resorted to spamming walls of text from seemingly the only book you have ever read while calling other people mad.
I'm not even a protestant. I'm an atheist. You're a catholic latinx schizo who makes up deranged fantasies about john of gaunt, cries about the reformation, and pretends to love english culture yet brags about how the norman conquest was a "welsh revenge" against the anglo saxons.
Complete and utter Schizophrenia.

>>18125537
>brags about how the norman conquest was a "welsh revenge" against the anglo saxons

That actually was how the Normans and their Breton allies presented it, and that's why Arthurian literature took off in Britain after the conquest.
It's part of how they legitimized themselves.
Your idea that things like poetry and mythology aren't created and used by the nobility for propaganda really is very quaint.

You're so naive.
I think it's very funny how angry my shitposting makes you, but that's because you're an autist fedora tipper so par for the course.

Stuff yourself like Bentham when you finally ACK.
Guy Fawkes did nothing wrong.

>>18125572
>Guy Fawkes did nothing wrong.
What did he do? He was caught and died in excruciating circumstances.

File: zoomers.jpg (54 KB, 680x516)

54 KB JPG

>>18125572
>i was actually pretending to be retarded, i was totally shitposting, i wasn't frothing at the mouth
You're a bad liar, puritanschizo

>>18125581
It's very funny that a self described atheist has an entire folder filled with nothing but anti-catholic images.

You really have nothing better to do that qq about "papists" on the internet as an atheist living in the 21st century.
Sure you're not here specifically to do nothing but counter-signal, engage in damage control, and continually reference random off topic threads from years ago?
Your conduct would be very bizarre otherwise. What a strange and hateful person you are.
To think this is how completely debauched and small minded your average English materialist is, racist too I might add.
You're really no better than the foreigners your silly and impotent "riots" pretend to do anything about; you deserve each other.

You will put up with it until they stuff your corpse and put you in a museum as a taxidermied example of an extinct species, like how we treat the DoDo bird.
Spitefully denounce Fawkes despite the fact he's easily ten times the man you will ever be.

File: Tarbarrels2005.jpg (175 KB, 900x598)

175 KB JPG

>>18125613
>It's very funny that a self described atheist has an entire folder filled with nothing but anti-catholic images.
Its a meme image. One image is hardly an "entire folder".
You have nothing better to do than seethe at protestants and make up weird fantasies about torturing people you don't like.
I will have fun going to the Ottery St Mary tar barrel rolling in Devon on Guy Fawkes Night. Families will be there, people will get drunk, have a good time, it's a good laugh and a great tradition.
You, meanwhile will be seething in your room, reading and posting cobbet for the hundreth time and praying to the god you didn't even believe in two years ago. You're mentally ill. Stop engaging in catholic LARPs and weird conspiracies about dead historical figures do something with your life.

>>18124662
let's recap:
>swamp krauts
>you fucking retard
>um no ack-shually your bait is le weak
Good thing we settled this. Go cry elsewhere dumb dumb

>>18124429
You mean SAMHAIN

>>18125631
King Arthur is propaganda
Robin Hood is propaganda
Canterbury Tales is propaganda

you will take the "your favorite stories are ancient propaganda" pill and like it

>Chaucer's General Prologue is a more politically charged text than is usually supposed. It formulates post-Revolt ruling ideology through tactical distribution of blame for oppression among scapegoats, away from lordship (Knight) and Judiclary (Franklin). It recognizes a source of manorial exploitation primarily at the level of the Reeve, a peasant foreman whose harsh managerial rigour contrasts with the distant benevolence of his own lord while the anticlerical dimension of the Prologue's propagandist configuration is well known, readers have missed the full social implication of its uncompromising strategy (here termed ‘sisplacement of oppression’) because of the received myth of a socially unfixed Chaucer whose writing emantes from a classlessness straddling different social strata. Here it is argued that, on the contrary, a clear commitment to aristocratic ideology and disdain for peasant aspiration is visible in the General Prologue and persists in the tales, including the Summoner's Tale, as was apparent to a seventeenth–century pamphleteer.

File: 1741896640560886.jpg (253 KB, 1458x2048)

253 KB JPG

>>18124429
I celebrate Guy Fawkes day to remember his heroism

>>18124429
Halloween came from Samhain, which is a Gaelic holiday. It came from your island.

>>18126522
You claimed Spain was "the le good guy" you papist nigger. That's bait.

>>18126585
Based

File: images (1) (1).jpg (30 KB, 701x438)

30 KB JPG

>>18125126
>The """cuck""" who retrieved the throne and was bested by the DvtchBvlls the De Witt brothers when they had De Ruyter on their team and Charlie was trying to piece back together a country that had just gone through not one, not even two, but three civil wars
Even if he's a schizotard he makes a compelling argument, whereas you're just a screeching faggot who clearly doesn't know jack shit about anything.
>b-b-b-but I larp through muh family lineage
Proof that you're the true poser here faggot

bump